An Adaptive Risk-Aware Machine Learning Framework for Cost-Effective Regression Test Case Prioritization

Regression testing is essential for identifying defects after software changes, but running all test cases can be time-consuming and costly. This paper proposes an Adaptive Risk-Aware Machine Learning Framework for Cost-Effective Regression Test Case Prioritization. The framework uses a Random Forest classifier to predict test case risk based on change impact, historical failures, code coverage, execution cost, and recent results. It dynamically prioritizes test cases using predicted risk, execution cost, and feedback from prior executions. We evaluated the approach using APFD, APFDc, fault detection rate, and execution cost. Experimental results show an APFD of 0.7173 and an APFDc of 0.7987, demonstrating improved test case prioritization compared with the selected baseline techniques.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev10i4-1724398
Primary Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Adaptive Risk-Aware Machine Learning Framework for Cost-Effective Regression Test Case Prioritization

Priya Sawant, Jyoti Tale
3 links
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
article

An Adaptive Risk-Aware Machine Learning Framework for Cost-Effective Regression Test Case Prioritization

Priya Sawant, Jyoti Tale
article en

Abstract

Regression testing is essential for identifying defects after software changes, but running all test cases can be time-consuming and costly. This paper proposes an Adaptive Risk-Aware Machine Learning Framework for Cost-Effective Regression Test Case Prioritization. The framework uses a Random Forest classifier to predict test case risk based on change impact, historical failures, code coverage, execution cost, and recent results. It dynamically prioritizes test cases using predicted risk, execution cost, and feedback from prior executions. We evaluated the approach using APFD, APFDc, fault detection rate, and execution cost. Experimental results show an APFD of 0.7173 and an APFDc of 0.7987, demonstrating improved test case prioritization compared with the selected baseline techniques.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 10(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon