What We Owe to Each Other Is Inclusion: A Scanlonian Argument for Workforce DEI Practices
ABSTRACT Efforts toward diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) require a strong normative foundation. Prior normative arguments help, but Scanlon's (1998) contractualism offers stronger foundations, especially as augmented by intersubjective reflection (IR) (Scharding & Warren, 2023). This article develops two such arguments. The first: serious inequities facing many employees and candidates outweigh concerns about those who may lose some opportunities despite slightly higher qualifications under traditional measures. The second, more novel argument: because companies affect groups differently, they must build diverse teams that can identify, prevent, and repair these inequities. In both contexts, IR cultivates empathy, building greater consensus and intergroup harmony.
Authors
- Bill D. Herman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-6430)
Institutions
- Metropolitan State University of Denver (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Business and Society Review
- Published
- 2026-10-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70077
- Primary Topic
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Office of Diversity and Inclusion