What We Owe to Each Other Is Inclusion: A Scanlonian Argument for Workforce DEI Practices

ABSTRACT Efforts toward diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) require a strong normative foundation. Prior normative arguments help, but Scanlon's (1998) contractualism offers stronger foundations, especially as augmented by intersubjective reflection (IR) (Scharding & Warren, 2023). This article develops two such arguments. The first: serious inequities facing many employees and candidates outweigh concerns about those who may lose some opportunities despite slightly higher qualifications under traditional measures. The second, more novel argument: because companies affect groups differently, they must build diverse teams that can identify, prevent, and repair these inequities. In both contexts, IR cultivates empathy, building greater consensus and intergroup harmony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business and Society Review
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70077
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What We Owe to Each Other Is Inclusion: A Scanlonian Argument for Workforce DEI Practices

Bill D. Herman
2 links
Business and Society Review
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

What We Owe to Each Other Is Inclusion: A Scanlonian Argument for Workforce DEI Practices

Bill D. Herman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Efforts toward diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) require a strong normative foundation. Prior normative arguments help, but Scanlon's (1998) contractualism offers stronger foundations, especially as augmented by intersubjective reflection (IR) (Scharding & Warren, 2023). This article develops two such arguments. The first: serious inequities facing many employees and candidates outweigh concerns about those who may lose some opportunities despite slightly higher qualifications under traditional measures. The second, more novel argument: because companies affect groups differently, they must build diverse teams that can identify, prevent, and repair these inequities. In both contexts, IR cultivates empathy, building greater consensus and intergroup harmony.

Business and Society ReviewVol. 131(4)
Metropolitan State University of Denver (US)
Office of Diversity and Inclusion
Reduced inequalities, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
What We Owe to Each Other Is Inclusion: A Scanlonian Argument for Workforce DEI Practices — Bill D. Herman · Business and Society Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS