Halting Biodiversity Loss Requires a Different Kind of Management Research

The first business and biodiversity assessment by the Intergovernmental Science‑Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services concludes that voluntary corporate action cannot halt biodiversity loss without broader shifts in the policy, economic, financial, social, and knowledge systems that shape business behavior and environmental outcomes. Yet management research on biodiversity remains largely firm-centric, attending to what individual firms measure, disclose, and do, while often overlooking these wider systems. We propose four interrelated research priorities to reorient the field: the political economy of inaction, the limits of organizational capability, the viability of organizing beyond growth, and reconceptualizing the firm–nature relationship. Pursuing them requires research that is interdisciplinary—drawing on insights beyond management—and transdisciplinary, co‑producing decision‑relevant knowledge with the actors who shape and experience biodiversity outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization & Environment
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266261500669
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Halting Biodiversity Loss Requires a Different Kind of Management Research

Rajat Panwar, Ryo Kohsaka, Joseph W. Bull, Beatrice Crona et al.
Organization & Environment
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

Halting Biodiversity Loss Requires a Different Kind of Management Research

Rajat Panwar, Ryo Kohsaka, Joseph W. Bull, Beatrice Crona, Lisa Mandle
article en

Abstract

The first business and biodiversity assessment by the Intergovernmental Science‑Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services concludes that voluntary corporate action cannot halt biodiversity loss without broader shifts in the policy, economic, financial, social, and knowledge systems that shape business behavior and environmental outcomes. Yet management research on biodiversity remains largely firm-centric, attending to what individual firms measure, disclose, and do, while often overlooking these wider systems. We propose four interrelated research priorities to reorient the field: the political economy of inaction, the limits of organizational capability, the viability of organizing beyond growth, and reconceptualizing the firm–nature relationship. Pursuing them requires research that is interdisciplinary—drawing on insights beyond management—and transdisciplinary, co‑producing decision‑relevant knowledge with the actors who shape and experience biodiversity outcomes.

Organization & Environment
Oregon State University (US), Stockholm University (SE), University of Oxford (GB), The University of Tokyo (JP), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon