Integrative review of consumers’ experiences of care in emergency departments for suicidality

Objectives To synthesise evidence on consumers’ experiences of care when presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with suicidal ideation or behaviour. Methods An integrative review of studies published between 2015 and 2026 was conducted using five databases. 18 studies were included and appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were analysed using Whittemore and Knafl’s constant comparative method. Results Four themes were identified: (1) Chaotic and dehumanising ED, (2) relationships and communication which has two subthemes: (2a) helpful approaches and (2b) unhelpful relationships and communication, (3) polarising experiences of assessment and (4) feeling lost and vulnerable: experiences of hospital discharge and follow-up care. Consumers reported long wait times, lack of privacy and pressured atmosphere. Experiences of care were shaped by inconsistent knowledge and treatment from staff ranging from empathetic approaches fostering trust to stigmatising and dismissive behaviour which undermined engagement. Suicide assessments in ED were typically perceived as superficial. Moreover, inadequate discharge preparation, limited care continuity and insufficient follow-up support were identified as issues affecting participants. Conclusions System-level and staff training are needed to enhance engagement, perceived safety and suicide prevention outcomes for consumers experiencing suicidality in emergency settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2026-216460
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrative review of consumers’ experiences of care in emergency departments for suicidality

Shohreh Razavy, Katherine Louise Cooper, Chantale Boustany, Mark Goodhew et al.
Emergency Medicine Journal
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Integrative review of consumers’ experiences of care in emergency departments for suicidality

Shohreh Razavy, Katherine Louise Cooper, Chantale Boustany, Mark Goodhew, Gillian Murphy, Tracy McFadden, Glenda Webb
article en

Abstract

Objectives To synthesise evidence on consumers’ experiences of care when presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with suicidal ideation or behaviour. Methods An integrative review of studies published between 2015 and 2026 was conducted using five databases. 18 studies were included and appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were analysed using Whittemore and Knafl’s constant comparative method. Results Four themes were identified: (1) Chaotic and dehumanising ED, (2) relationships and communication which has two subthemes: (2a) helpful approaches and (2b) unhelpful relationships and communication, (3) polarising experiences of assessment and (4) feeling lost and vulnerable: experiences of hospital discharge and follow-up care. Consumers reported long wait times, lack of privacy and pressured atmosphere. Experiences of care were shaped by inconsistent knowledge and treatment from staff ranging from empathetic approaches fostering trust to stigmatising and dismissive behaviour which undermined engagement. Suicide assessments in ED were typically perceived as superficial. Moreover, inadequate discharge preparation, limited care continuity and insufficient follow-up support were identified as issues affecting participants. Conclusions System-level and staff training are needed to enhance engagement, perceived safety and suicide prevention outcomes for consumers experiencing suicidality in emergency settings.

Emergency Medicine Journal
The University of Sydney (AU), South Western Sydney Local Health District (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Western Sydney University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon