Structure-Actuation Co-Design of All-Electric Heavy-Duty Robotic Manipulators

This paper presents a mixed discrete-continuous multiobjective bilevel framework for the structure-actuation co-design of all-electric heavy-duty robotic manipulators. The upper level optimizes manipulator geometry and actuation topology, while joint-specific lower-level searches construct feasible archives of discrete motor, gearbox, and screw configurations. A system-level coordinator selects actuator packages according to hardware mass, co-design cost, and loss-aware supply energy, and the resulting actuator masses are fed back to the robot model until a mass-consistent fixed point is obtained. Evaluation on a full-pose SE(3) benchmark with a 100-kg tool payload yields eight feasible nondominated designs, all satisfying the 12 prescribed poses. Actuator-mass coupling converges in three iterations for every reported design. A fixed-design ablation shows that one-pass sequential sizing changes hardware mass by up to 2.13%, co-design cost by 10.20%, and supply energy by 9.40% in magnitude. Payload screening further reveals increasing mass-cost-energy demand and changes in competitive mechanism topology with carried load.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.36996
Primary Topic
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Structure-Actuation Co-Design of All-Electric Heavy-Duty Robotic Manipulators

Jouni Mattila, Amir Hossein Barjini, Mohammad Bahari
arXiv (Cornell University)
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
preprint

Structure-Actuation Co-Design of All-Electric Heavy-Duty Robotic Manipulators

Jouni Mattila, Amir Hossein Barjini, Mohammad Bahari
preprint en

Abstract

This paper presents a mixed discrete-continuous multiobjective bilevel framework for the structure-actuation co-design of all-electric heavy-duty robotic manipulators. The upper level optimizes manipulator geometry and actuation topology, while joint-specific lower-level searches construct feasible archives of discrete motor, gearbox, and screw configurations. A system-level coordinator selects actuator packages according to hardware mass, co-design cost, and loss-aware supply energy, and the resulting actuator masses are fed back to the robot model until a mass-consistent fixed point is obtained. Evaluation on a full-pose SE(3) benchmark with a 100-kg tool payload yields eight feasible nondominated designs, all satisfying the 12 prescribed poses. Actuator-mass coupling converges in three iterations for every reported design. A fixed-design ablation shows that one-pass sequential sizing changes hardware mass by up to 2.13%, co-design cost by 10.20%, and supply energy by 9.40% in magnitude. Payload screening further reveals increasing mass-cost-energy demand and changes in competitive mechanism topology with carried load.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon