Banks' Liability for Unauthorized Electronic Transactions in India: A Study of Customer Protection in Digital Banking

India has made significant shifts towards digital banking, using UPI, mobile banking, cards and net banking to make payments faster and cheaper. However, as a result of these developments, the risk of banking fraud has shifted from the branch counter to the customer’s phone. In cases where a customer’s bank account is debited without her authority, the law in India attempts to answer the question as to who should bear that loss – the bank or the customer. This paper discusses the law on this issue in India. It begins by discussing the relationship between the banker and the customer, then analyses the Reserve Bank of India’s circular of 6 July 2017 on limiting the liability of customers. It also analyses the approach of the courts; in particular the Gauhati High Court and the Supreme Court in State Bank of India v. Pallabh Bhowmick. Furthermore, the paper investigates the remedies available to customers under the Consumer Protection Act 2019, the Information Technology Act 2000 and the RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme. Additionally, the paper evaluates the RBI’s 2026 amendment directions on digital fraud compensation for small values. The Indian law on this issue is also compared to the laws of the United Kingdom, the United States and Singapore. The paper argues that the 2017 RBI framework is sound in principle, but could be improved with more specific standards, better enforcement and changes to accommodate socially engineered fraud. Finally, specific suggestions are made for the reform of the digital fraud compensation framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23739675
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Banks' Liability for Unauthorized Electronic Transactions in India: A Study of Customer Protection in Digital Banking

P Naveen Kumar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

Banks' Liability for Unauthorized Electronic Transactions in India: A Study of Customer Protection in Digital Banking

P Naveen Kumar
article en

Abstract

India has made significant shifts towards digital banking, using UPI, mobile banking, cards and net banking to make payments faster and cheaper. However, as a result of these developments, the risk of banking fraud has shifted from the branch counter to the customer’s phone. In cases where a customer’s bank account is debited without her authority, the law in India attempts to answer the question as to who should bear that loss – the bank or the customer. This paper discusses the law on this issue in India. It begins by discussing the relationship between the banker and the customer, then analyses the Reserve Bank of India’s circular of 6 July 2017 on limiting the liability of customers. It also analyses the approach of the courts; in particular the Gauhati High Court and the Supreme Court in State Bank of India v. Pallabh Bhowmick. Furthermore, the paper investigates the remedies available to customers under the Consumer Protection Act 2019, the Information Technology Act 2000 and the RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme. Additionally, the paper evaluates the RBI’s 2026 amendment directions on digital fraud compensation for small values. The Indian law on this issue is also compared to the laws of the United Kingdom, the United States and Singapore. The paper argues that the 2017 RBI framework is sound in principle, but could be improved with more specific standards, better enforcement and changes to accommodate socially engineered fraud. Finally, specific suggestions are made for the reform of the digital fraud compensation framework.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Rashtriya Raksha University (IN)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon