Prediction of overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia using supervised machine learning

Background Risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is traditionally based on cytogenetic and genetic features alone and does not incorporate patient-related clinical variables. This study evaluated whether machine learning (ML) models integrating clinical, cytogenetic, and genetic features improve prediction of 1-year and overall survival (OS) compared with guideline-based risk stratification. Patients and methods We conducted a study of 785 contemporary real-world patients with AML. Patients were stratified by treatment intensity (intensive and non-intensive). Several ML models for binary 1-year survival and time-to-event OS were trained using three feature sets: clinical alone; clinical plus cytogenetics; and combined clinical, cytogenetic, and genetic. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and C-index and compared with current models by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 and 2024. Results The binary classification performance was similar across treatment groups with ROC-AUC between 0.5 and 0.7. Predictive performance for OS varied by treatment group, where ML models for non-intensively treated patients achieved better performance (C-index >0.75), consistently outperforming ELN2024 (C-index ∼0.57). In intensively treated patients, performance was lower and did not outperform ELN2022 although best results were obtained using combined clinical and cytogenetic features. Adding genetic features did not consistently improve model performance across settings. Models using the full feature set indicate that clinical variables have the greatest impact. Conclusions ML-based models yielded better or equal prognostic accuracy compared with ELN 2022 and 2024, highlighting the value of integrating clinical features. Limited performance in intensively treated patients suggests a need for dynamic predictors, such as treatment response measures, to enhance risk stratification further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmorw.2026.100806
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia using supervised machine learning

Rasmus Froberg Brøndum, Anne Stidsholt Roug, Daniel Tuyet Kristensen, Estrid Vilma Solyom Høgdall et al.
4 links
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Prediction of overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia using supervised machine learning

Rasmus Froberg Brøndum, Anne Stidsholt Roug, Daniel Tuyet Kristensen, Estrid Vilma Solyom Høgdall, Claus Werenberg Marcher, Andreas Due Ørskov, Juan Manuel Rodríguez, Claudia Schöllkopf, Michael Knudsen, Vibe Skov, O.H. Larsen, M. Klarskov, C. Vejgaard, L. Grubach, B. Preiss, M.T. Severinsen, M. Bøgsted, T.S. Poulsen, J.W. Hansen, J.B. Cowland, M.S. Andersen, M.L. Bibi, K. Grønbæk, S. Vang
article en

Abstract

Background Risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is traditionally based on cytogenetic and genetic features alone and does not incorporate patient-related clinical variables. This study evaluated whether machine learning (ML) models integrating clinical, cytogenetic, and genetic features improve prediction of 1-year and overall survival (OS) compared with guideline-based risk stratification. Patients and methods We conducted a study of 785 contemporary real-world patients with AML. Patients were stratified by treatment intensity (intensive and non-intensive). Several ML models for binary 1-year survival and time-to-event OS were trained using three feature sets: clinical alone; clinical plus cytogenetics; and combined clinical, cytogenetic, and genetic. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and C-index and compared with current models by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 and 2024. Results The binary classification performance was similar across treatment groups with ROC-AUC between 0.5 and 0.7. Predictive performance for OS varied by treatment group, where ML models for non-intensively treated patients achieved better performance (C-index >0.75), consistently outperforming ELN2024 (C-index ∼0.57). In intensively treated patients, performance was lower and did not outperform ELN2022 although best results were obtained using combined clinical and cytogenetic features. Adding genetic features did not consistently improve model performance across settings. Models using the full feature set indicate that clinical variables have the greatest impact. Conclusions ML-based models yielded better or equal prognostic accuracy compared with ELN 2022 and 2024, highlighting the value of integrating clinical features. Limited performance in intensively treated patients suggests a need for dynamic predictors, such as treatment response measures, to enhance risk stratification further.

ESMO Real World Data and Digital OncologyVol. 14
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Roskilde Sygehus (DK), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Herlev Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Kræftens Bekæmpelse, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Dansk Kræftforsknings Fond, Aalborg Universitetshospital, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Medac
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon