Molecular Insights into Oil–Water Interfacial Behavior of Gemini Sulfonate Surfactants: The Critical Role of Spacer Group

Gemini surfactants are extensively employed in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) owing to their low critical micelle concentration (CMC), excellent interfacial activity, and strong self–assembly capability. However, molecular–level understanding of how spacer chemistry regulates the interfacial behavior of sulfonate–containing gemini surfactants remains limited. All–atom molecular dynamics simulations were employed to investigate four gemini sulfonate surfactants with distinct spacers (carbon–chain spacer (CA), ester containing spacer (EG), benzene–ring spacer (BR), and nitrogen–containing (NA)) at the n–decane/water interface. Based on its superior interfacial performance, the EG system was further selected to evaluate the effects of polyacrylamide (PAM) and partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM). Increasing surfactant concentration markedly altered interfacial assembly, and at 2.33 μmol/m2, pronounced interfacial curvature indicated a tendency toward microemulsion-like structures. Spacer chemistry strongly regulated interfacial thickness, hydration, and molecular organization. The rigid aromatic spacer of BR broadened the interfacial region through its strong oil–phase affinity, whereas the ester–containing EG spacer enhanced hydration and hydrogen–bond formation and promoted favorable molecular packing, resulting in the best overall interfacial performance. Further simulations showed that PAM accumulated near the EG interfacial layer and strongly interacted with EG, leading to a pronounced reduction in interfacial tension. In contrast, hydrolysis strengthened HPAM–water interactions and promoted its distribution in the bulk aqueous phase, thereby limiting its influence on the interface. This study provides molecular insights into how different spacer groups regulate interfacial behavior, offering theoretical guidance for the design and formulation of gemini surfactant systems for EOR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18212665
Primary Topic
Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Molecular Insights into Oil–Water Interfacial Behavior of Gemini Sulfonate Surfactants: The Critical Role of Spacer Group

Shuixiang Xie, Hao Lü, WANG Qinghong, Chunmao Chen et al.
1 links
Polymers
Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
article

Molecular Insights into Oil–Water Interfacial Behavior of Gemini Sulfonate Surfactants: The Critical Role of Spacer Group

Shuixiang Xie, Hao Lü, WANG Qinghong, Chunmao Chen, Jinyuan Zhang, Linglan Zhang, Ling Lin, Xingchun Li, Wen Ren
article en

Abstract

Gemini surfactants are extensively employed in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) owing to their low critical micelle concentration (CMC), excellent interfacial activity, and strong self–assembly capability. However, molecular–level understanding of how spacer chemistry regulates the interfacial behavior of sulfonate–containing gemini surfactants remains limited. All–atom molecular dynamics simulations were employed to investigate four gemini sulfonate surfactants with distinct spacers (carbon–chain spacer (CA), ester containing spacer (EG), benzene–ring spacer (BR), and nitrogen–containing (NA)) at the n–decane/water interface. Based on its superior interfacial performance, the EG system was further selected to evaluate the effects of polyacrylamide (PAM) and partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM). Increasing surfactant concentration markedly altered interfacial assembly, and at 2.33 μmol/m2, pronounced interfacial curvature indicated a tendency toward microemulsion-like structures. Spacer chemistry strongly regulated interfacial thickness, hydration, and molecular organization. The rigid aromatic spacer of BR broadened the interfacial region through its strong oil–phase affinity, whereas the ester–containing EG spacer enhanced hydration and hydrogen–bond formation and promoted favorable molecular packing, resulting in the best overall interfacial performance. Further simulations showed that PAM accumulated near the EG interfacial layer and strongly interacted with EG, leading to a pronounced reduction in interfacial tension. In contrast, hydrolysis strengthened HPAM–water interactions and promoted its distribution in the bulk aqueous phase, thereby limiting its influence on the interface. This study provides molecular insights into how different spacer groups regulate interfacial behavior, offering theoretical guidance for the design and formulation of gemini surfactant systems for EOR.

PolymersVol. 18(21)
Southwest Petroleum University (CN), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon