Improved temperature and photoperiod response functions to better link genotype to phenotype prediction for soybean phenology

Gene-to-phenotype modeling requires robust mechanistic frameworks, yet widely used soybean phenology models rely on older datasets with limited genotypic representation and do not explicitly account for twilight effects. We quantified soybean phenology responses to temperature (11-35 °C) and photoperiod (12-16 h) using 20 modern cultivars spanning maturity groups (MG) 0-7, evaluated across 12 controlled-environment experiments and 13 field experiments in the USA. Our objectives were to (1) reconstruct temperature and photoperiod response functions for three developmental phases (emergence - flowering, flowering - beginning seed filling, and beginning seed filling - physiological maturity), (2) determine whether these responses vary among cultivars, and (3) identify the twilight value that maximizes prediction accuracy and evaluate an improved soybean phenology module. Temperature responses were best described by a curvilinear function, with optimum temperature declining from vegetative to reproductive development (30.4 to 22.1 °C). Photoperiod responses followed a bilinear model, with photoperiod sensitivity and minimum phase duration varying systematically with maturity group, whereas no photoperiod response was detected during the seed filling period. Prediction accuracy across independent field experiments was maximized using a twilight angle of -6°, with an uncalibrated multiplicative model achieving a root mean squared error (RMSE) <10 days and an index of agreement (d-index) >0.96. Our results show that variation in photoperiod response is driven primarily by photoperiod sensitivity rather than the critical photoperiod threshold, improving cultivar parameterization, reducing equifinality, and providing a stronger physiological foundation for improving crop model prediction accuracy across diverse genotypes and environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erag552
Primary Topic
Soybean genetics and cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved temperature and photoperiod response functions to better link genotype to phenotype prediction for soybean phenology

Brenda L. Gambín, Sotirios V. Archontoulis, Colin R. Cavanagh, Isaiah Huber et al.
Journal of Experimental Botany
Soybean genetics and cultivation
article

Improved temperature and photoperiod response functions to better link genotype to phenotype prediction for soybean phenology

Brenda L. Gambín, Sotirios V. Archontoulis, Colin R. Cavanagh, Isaiah Huber, Graeme Hammer, Mark Cooper, Issa Coulibaly
article en

Abstract

Gene-to-phenotype modeling requires robust mechanistic frameworks, yet widely used soybean phenology models rely on older datasets with limited genotypic representation and do not explicitly account for twilight effects. We quantified soybean phenology responses to temperature (11-35 °C) and photoperiod (12-16 h) using 20 modern cultivars spanning maturity groups (MG) 0-7, evaluated across 12 controlled-environment experiments and 13 field experiments in the USA. Our objectives were to (1) reconstruct temperature and photoperiod response functions for three developmental phases (emergence - flowering, flowering - beginning seed filling, and beginning seed filling - physiological maturity), (2) determine whether these responses vary among cultivars, and (3) identify the twilight value that maximizes prediction accuracy and evaluate an improved soybean phenology module. Temperature responses were best described by a curvilinear function, with optimum temperature declining from vegetative to reproductive development (30.4 to 22.1 °C). Photoperiod responses followed a bilinear model, with photoperiod sensitivity and minimum phase duration varying systematically with maturity group, whereas no photoperiod response was detected during the seed filling period. Prediction accuracy across independent field experiments was maximized using a twilight angle of -6°, with an uncalibrated multiplicative model achieving a root mean squared error (RMSE) <10 days and an index of agreement (d-index) >0.96. Our results show that variation in photoperiod response is driven primarily by photoperiod sensitivity rather than the critical photoperiod threshold, improving cultivar parameterization, reducing equifinality, and providing a stronger physiological foundation for improving crop model prediction accuracy across diverse genotypes and environments.

Journal of Experimental Botany
The University of Queensland (AU), Iowa State University (US), ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Soybean genetics and cultivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon