Optimizing Instant Rice Quality of Milled and Brown Rice Through Cultivar‐Selection

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Instant rice products are increasingly favored for convenience; however, achieving consistent quality, particularly rehydration performance and texture, remains a challenge. Rice cultivars differ in physicochemical properties that influence processing behavior and final product quality, yet systematic screening approaches for instant rice optimization are limited. This study evaluated the instantization potential of 25 rice cultivars (hybrid and pureline; medium and long grain) in milled and brown forms to identify those most suitable for instant rice processing. Parameters measured included amylose and protein contents, gelatinization temperature (GT), cooking duration (CD), percentage point moisture removal (ΔMC %), texture, rehydration ratio, volume increase ratio (VIR), bulk density, whiteness index, and water activity ( a w ). Findings Cultivar and grain form (milled vs. brown) influenced nearly all instant rice quality attributes ( p < 0.05). Breeding type was not a major main effect for instant rice quality except through a grain form‐breeding type interaction that affected ΔMC (%) during stepwise hot‐air drying (SHAD) ( p < 0.05). Brown instant rice showed lower rehydration and VIR but greater hardness than milled instant rice. Principal component analysis (PCA) explained 61.4% of the variance in milled instant rice quality and 48.5% in brown. Based on multi‐attribute optimization, X16 (long‐grain hybrid) and Y3 (long‐grain pureline) were identified as the top‐performing cultivars among milled and brown rice, respectively (actual names are coded). Cultivars Y5 and Y6 (medium‐grain pureline) underperformed in key quality traits across both grain forms (actual names are coded). Conclusions These findings indicate that instantization performance depended more on cultivar and grain form than breeding type. Overall, screening results demonstrated clear cultivar differences in instantization performance for both milled and brown rice forms. Significance and Novelty These results provide practical guidance for processors in selecting cultivars with favorable physicochemical profiles to produce instant rice with improved and more consistent quality. Cultivar selection is often based primarily on agronomic performance and milling yield, whereas processing suitability receives less attention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cereal Chemistry
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.70123
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Instant Rice Quality of Milled and Brown Rice Through Cultivar‐Selection

Kaushik Luthra, Faith Ouma, Griffiths Gregory Atungulu
1 links
Cereal Chemistry
Food composition and properties
article

Optimizing Instant Rice Quality of Milled and Brown Rice Through Cultivar‐Selection

Kaushik Luthra, Faith Ouma, Griffiths Gregory Atungulu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Instant rice products are increasingly favored for convenience; however, achieving consistent quality, particularly rehydration performance and texture, remains a challenge. Rice cultivars differ in physicochemical properties that influence processing behavior and final product quality, yet systematic screening approaches for instant rice optimization are limited. This study evaluated the instantization potential of 25 rice cultivars (hybrid and pureline; medium and long grain) in milled and brown forms to identify those most suitable for instant rice processing. Parameters measured included amylose and protein contents, gelatinization temperature (GT), cooking duration (CD), percentage point moisture removal (ΔMC %), texture, rehydration ratio, volume increase ratio (VIR), bulk density, whiteness index, and water activity ( a w ). Findings Cultivar and grain form (milled vs. brown) influenced nearly all instant rice quality attributes ( p < 0.05). Breeding type was not a major main effect for instant rice quality except through a grain form‐breeding type interaction that affected ΔMC (%) during stepwise hot‐air drying (SHAD) ( p < 0.05). Brown instant rice showed lower rehydration and VIR but greater hardness than milled instant rice. Principal component analysis (PCA) explained 61.4% of the variance in milled instant rice quality and 48.5% in brown. Based on multi‐attribute optimization, X16 (long‐grain hybrid) and Y3 (long‐grain pureline) were identified as the top‐performing cultivars among milled and brown rice, respectively (actual names are coded). Cultivars Y5 and Y6 (medium‐grain pureline) underperformed in key quality traits across both grain forms (actual names are coded). Conclusions These findings indicate that instantization performance depended more on cultivar and grain form than breeding type. Overall, screening results demonstrated clear cultivar differences in instantization performance for both milled and brown rice forms. Significance and Novelty These results provide practical guidance for processors in selecting cultivars with favorable physicochemical profiles to produce instant rice with improved and more consistent quality. Cultivar selection is often based primarily on agronomic performance and milling yield, whereas processing suitability receives less attention.

Cereal Chemistry
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas System, RiceTec
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Food composition and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon