Benchmarking Pose Estimation and Two-Camera Angle Configurations for Markerless Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Prediction

Abstract Low-cost RGB video-based markerless motion capture is attractive for estimating lower-limb biomechanics, but the influence of implementation choices on the resulting kinematic and kinetic estimates remains uncertain. This proof-of-concept study developed a two-camera video-based musculoskeletal multibody dynamics workflow and assessed two pose estimation algorithm, RTMPose-x with the HALPE_26 keypoint convention and OpenPose with the BODY_25 convention, and three camera placement angles (20°, 40°, and 60°). Ten healthy male participants performed walking, running, and squatting while barefoot and wearing minimal clothing. In the video-based workflow, kinetic outputs were computed with ground reaction forces (GRFs) estimated using a foot–ground contact model and subsequently used to calculate joint contact forces (JCFs). A force-plate-informed Vicon-driven musculoskeletal model served as the reference. Relative to OpenPose-BODY_25, RTMPose-x–HALPE_26 produced 2.8%–26.4% lower root mean square errors (RMSEs) and 1.0%–46.3% higher Pearson correlation coefficients (ρ) for knee flexion–extension across the three activities, as well as 1.5%–38.2% lower RMSEs and 1.0%–16.4% higher correlations for most JCF outcomes. The 60° configuration showed favorable performance for selected biomechanical outcomes within the tested range. Overall, RTMPose-x–HALPE_26 showed lower numerical errors and/or stronger waveform correlations than OpenPose-BODY_25 for several outcomes, although these differences varied across activities and biomechanical variables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aebaa7
Primary Topic
Human Pose and Action Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Pose Estimation and Two-Camera Angle Configurations for Markerless Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Prediction

Qiang Gao, Yinghu Peng, Zhifeng Zhang, Qitao Tan et al.
3 links
Measurement Science and Technology
Human Pose and Action Recognition
article

Benchmarking Pose Estimation and Two-Camera Angle Configurations for Markerless Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Prediction

Qiang Gao, Yinghu Peng, Zhifeng Zhang, Qitao Tan, Weijie Zhang, Pingping Wei, Zhenxian Chen, Jing Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Low-cost RGB video-based markerless motion capture is attractive for estimating lower-limb biomechanics, but the influence of implementation choices on the resulting kinematic and kinetic estimates remains uncertain. This proof-of-concept study developed a two-camera video-based musculoskeletal multibody dynamics workflow and assessed two pose estimation algorithm, RTMPose-x with the HALPE_26 keypoint convention and OpenPose with the BODY_25 convention, and three camera placement angles (20°, 40°, and 60°). Ten healthy male participants performed walking, running, and squatting while barefoot and wearing minimal clothing. In the video-based workflow, kinetic outputs were computed with ground reaction forces (GRFs) estimated using a foot–ground contact model and subsequently used to calculate joint contact forces (JCFs). A force-plate-informed Vicon-driven musculoskeletal model served as the reference. Relative to OpenPose-BODY_25, RTMPose-x–HALPE_26 produced 2.8%–26.4% lower root mean square errors (RMSEs) and 1.0%–46.3% higher Pearson correlation coefficients (ρ) for knee flexion–extension across the three activities, as well as 1.5%–38.2% lower RMSEs and 1.0%–16.4% higher correlations for most JCF outcomes. The 60° configuration showed favorable performance for selected biomechanical outcomes within the tested range. Overall, RTMPose-x–HALPE_26 showed lower numerical errors and/or stronger waveform correlations than OpenPose-BODY_25 for several outcomes, although these differences varied across activities and biomechanical variables.

Measurement Science and Technology
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Chang'an University (CN), Xi'an Honghui Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University (CN), Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Honghui Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical University, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Human Pose and Action Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon