Multidimensional transdiagnostic inventory of psychopathology: development and initial validation

Traditional diagnostic systems, such as the DSM-5 and ICD-11, suffer from well-documented limitations, including high comorbidity rates, arbitrary diagnostic thresholds, and within-disorder heterogeneity. Consequently, the field is evolving towards hierarchical, transdiagnostic, dimensional models of psychopathology. This study reports on the development and initial validation of the Multidimensional Transdiagnostic Inventory of Psychopathology (MTIP). This new broadband inventory aligns traditional DSM disorders with contemporary dimensional models of psychopathology. We conducted initial development and basic psychometric analyses in a mixed sample of 301 adults. We then validated the MTIP in a second independent sample (N = 826), of which 640 who self-reported no history of past mental health treatment were used as our normative/reference sample. The final MTIP contained 13 clinical scales and seven supplemental scales. All the MTIP scales met core psychometric assumptions at the item, scale, and transdiagnostic levels. A series of exploratory and second-order factor analyses supported the MTIP hierarchical dimensional structure. Concurrent validity correlations with the DSM-5 level 1 cross-cutting symptom measure were strong, ranging from 0.89 (depression) to 0.51 (drug misuse). Regression analyses supported the construct validity of the higher-order transdiagnostic scales. Twelve of the 13 clinical scales differentiated individuals with a history of mental health care from those without past care, with effect sizes ranging from 0.20 (Alcohol Misuse) to 1.06 (Anxiety). Effect sizes for the transdiagnostic scales ranged from 0.33 (Thought Dysregulation) to 1.07 (Emotion Dysregulation). The clinical implications and potential applications of the MTIP are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1917064
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidimensional transdiagnostic inventory of psychopathology: development and initial validation

Till Julius Adam, Mark A. Blais, Christoph U. Correll, Hannah Cai
3 links
Frontiers in Psychology
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Multidimensional transdiagnostic inventory of psychopathology: development and initial validation

Till Julius Adam, Mark A. Blais, Christoph U. Correll, Hannah Cai
article en

Abstract

Traditional diagnostic systems, such as the DSM-5 and ICD-11, suffer from well-documented limitations, including high comorbidity rates, arbitrary diagnostic thresholds, and within-disorder heterogeneity. Consequently, the field is evolving towards hierarchical, transdiagnostic, dimensional models of psychopathology. This study reports on the development and initial validation of the Multidimensional Transdiagnostic Inventory of Psychopathology (MTIP). This new broadband inventory aligns traditional DSM disorders with contemporary dimensional models of psychopathology. We conducted initial development and basic psychometric analyses in a mixed sample of 301 adults. We then validated the MTIP in a second independent sample (N = 826), of which 640 who self-reported no history of past mental health treatment were used as our normative/reference sample. The final MTIP contained 13 clinical scales and seven supplemental scales. All the MTIP scales met core psychometric assumptions at the item, scale, and transdiagnostic levels. A series of exploratory and second-order factor analyses supported the MTIP hierarchical dimensional structure. Concurrent validity correlations with the DSM-5 level 1 cross-cutting symptom measure were strong, ranging from 0.89 (depression) to 0.51 (drug misuse). Regression analyses supported the construct validity of the higher-order transdiagnostic scales. Twelve of the 13 clinical scales differentiated individuals with a history of mental health care from those without past care, with effect sizes ranging from 0.20 (Alcohol Misuse) to 1.06 (Anxiety). Effect sizes for the transdiagnostic scales ranged from 0.33 (Thought Dysregulation) to 1.07 (Emotion Dysregulation). The clinical implications and potential applications of the MTIP are discussed.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Northwell Health (US), Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Zucker Hillside Hospital (US), Deutsches Zentrum für Psychische Gesundheit (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon