Global Epidemiology of Snakebite Envenoming: A Scoping Review of Geographic Gaps and Reported Data

Snakebite envenoming is the world’s deadliest neglected tropical disease, predominantly affecting the most resource-limited regions. This scoping review aimed to map the global landscape of studies investigating the epidemiology of snakebite envenoming. Of the 1700 studies included in this review, nearly half were from authors based in high-income countries. While trends in authorship have changed over time, authors from low-income countries were consistently underrepresented in the body of literature. This underscores a critical gap between where the burden of snakebite lies and where the literature is coming from (which may, in part, reflect general geographic inequities in the literature databases). Further, there were variables that were well-reported across the body of literature, like age and sex of the person affected by snakebite envenoming. However, there were gaps related to the reporting of outcomes such as reproductive complications, qualitative outcomes, and costs associated with snakebite care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxins
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins18110468
Primary Topic
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Epidemiology of Snakebite Envenoming: A Scoping Review of Geographic Gaps and Reported Data

Aashna Uppal, Paul Tunde KingPriest, Trudie A. Lang, Parinita Arora et al.
2 links
Toxins
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
article

Global Epidemiology of Snakebite Envenoming: A Scoping Review of Geographic Gaps and Reported Data

Aashna Uppal, Paul Tunde KingPriest, Trudie A. Lang, Parinita Arora, Hams Bashir
article en

Abstract

Snakebite envenoming is the world’s deadliest neglected tropical disease, predominantly affecting the most resource-limited regions. This scoping review aimed to map the global landscape of studies investigating the epidemiology of snakebite envenoming. Of the 1700 studies included in this review, nearly half were from authors based in high-income countries. While trends in authorship have changed over time, authors from low-income countries were consistently underrepresented in the body of literature. This underscores a critical gap between where the burden of snakebite lies and where the literature is coming from (which may, in part, reflect general geographic inequities in the literature databases). Further, there were variables that were well-reported across the body of literature, like age and sex of the person affected by snakebite envenoming. However, there were gaps related to the reporting of outcomes such as reproductive complications, qualitative outcomes, and costs associated with snakebite care.

ToxinsVol. 18(11)
Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Oxford (GB)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon