Terminal-Outcome Prediction: Predicting Whether Computational Plans Will Complete Successfully Within Constraints

Computational systems frequently select execution plans according to immediate costs, heuristic estimates, or static scheduling rules. However, a plan that appears locally efficient may eventually fail because of resource exhaustion, deadline violations, dependency conflicts, accumulated queueing delays, intermediate-state constraints, or insufficient computational capacity. This paper proposes Terminal-Outcome Prediction (TOP), a conceptual framework for estimating whether a candidate computational plan will reach a successful terminal state while satisfying predefined execution constraints. Rather than evaluating a plan solely through its immediate cost or predicted completion time, TOP estimates the probability of successful completion, the expected terminal state, the likelihood and severity of constraint violations, and the computational resources required to reach termination. The framework represents computational planning as a sequential decision problem in which candidate plans are evaluated before commitment and may be reassessed as the system state changes. A terminal-outcome predictor estimates plan feasibility and outcome distributions, while a decision mechanism combines predicted success probability, execution utility, failure consequences, prediction uncertainty, and evaluation overhead. The framework supports learned prediction, simulation-based evaluation, and hybrid approaches. This paper presents a mathematical formulation, model-training objectives, an inference algorithm, and an experimental protocol for evaluating TOP in deadline-constrained workflows, resource-limited computation, and dependency-aware execution systems. No experimental results are claimed. The proposed contribution is a testable research framework whose effectiveness and distinctiveness must be established through systematic comparison with existing runtime prediction, workflow scheduling, feasibility estimation, and risk-aware planning methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23730654
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Terminal-Outcome Prediction: Predicting Whether Computational Plans Will Complete Successfully Within Constraints

Jincheng Zhang
8 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
preprint

Terminal-Outcome Prediction: Predicting Whether Computational Plans Will Complete Successfully Within Constraints

Jincheng Zhang
preprint en

Abstract

Computational systems frequently select execution plans according to immediate costs, heuristic estimates, or static scheduling rules. However, a plan that appears locally efficient may eventually fail because of resource exhaustion, deadline violations, dependency conflicts, accumulated queueing delays, intermediate-state constraints, or insufficient computational capacity. This paper proposes Terminal-Outcome Prediction (TOP), a conceptual framework for estimating whether a candidate computational plan will reach a successful terminal state while satisfying predefined execution constraints. Rather than evaluating a plan solely through its immediate cost or predicted completion time, TOP estimates the probability of successful completion, the expected terminal state, the likelihood and severity of constraint violations, and the computational resources required to reach termination. The framework represents computational planning as a sequential decision problem in which candidate plans are evaluated before commitment and may be reassessed as the system state changes. A terminal-outcome predictor estimates plan feasibility and outcome distributions, while a decision mechanism combines predicted success probability, execution utility, failure consequences, prediction uncertainty, and evaluation overhead. The framework supports learned prediction, simulation-based evaluation, and hybrid approaches. This paper presents a mathematical formulation, model-training objectives, an inference algorithm, and an experimental protocol for evaluating TOP in deadline-constrained workflows, resource-limited computation, and dependency-aware execution systems. No experimental results are claimed. The proposed contribution is a testable research framework whose effectiveness and distinctiveness must be established through systematic comparison with existing runtime prediction, workflow scheduling, feasibility estimation, and risk-aware planning methods.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon