Why We Say Yes When We Doubt: Trust, Social Pressure, and Independent Judgment as AI Changes Scams

Why can a request feel suspicious and still be difficult to refuse? Drawing on published research and my experience with Tech Talk for Seniors, this paper examines how emotion, social expectations, and the desire to help can lead people to comply despite their doubts. Artificial intelligence (AI) makes personally tailored messages easier to produce, increasing the importance of understanding what makes them persuasive. During short, high-pressure encounters, scammers can push people to act now, keep quiet, and check only through channels the scammer provides; I examine each as a point where that pressure might be resisted. A central insight is that people can step away and verify a request independently, even when they are unsure whether it is fraudulent. The paper connects this practical approach to a broader human question: how can support help people exercise their own judgment while preserving trust and independence?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pioneering Artificial Intelligence Research
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63721/26jpair0160
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why We Say Yes When We Doubt: Trust, Social Pressure, and Independent Judgment as AI Changes Scams

Allie Myerson
Journal of Pioneering Artificial Intelligence Research
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
article

Why We Say Yes When We Doubt: Trust, Social Pressure, and Independent Judgment as AI Changes Scams

Allie Myerson
article en

Abstract

Why can a request feel suspicious and still be difficult to refuse? Drawing on published research and my experience with Tech Talk for Seniors, this paper examines how emotion, social expectations, and the desire to help can lead people to comply despite their doubts. Artificial intelligence (AI) makes personally tailored messages easier to produce, increasing the importance of understanding what makes them persuasive. During short, high-pressure encounters, scammers can push people to act now, keep quiet, and check only through channels the scammer provides; I examine each as a point where that pressure might be resisted. A central insight is that people can step away and verify a request independently, even when they are unsure whether it is fraudulent. The paper connects this practical approach to a broader human question: how can support help people exercise their own judgment while preserving trust and independence?

Journal of Pioneering Artificial Intelligence ResearchVol. 2(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon