Artificial Intelligence-Based Triage and Diagnostic Support for Gastric Biopsies: A Multi-Centre Prospective Evaluation Across NHS Wales

Background: Histopathology workforce shortages and operational backlogs severely delay gastric cancer reporting. This multi-centre prospective evaluation assessed the diagnostic accuracy, clinical safety-net utility, and workflow triaging efficiency of an artificial intelligence (AI) platform for gastric biopsies across NHS Wales. Methods: A prospective cohort of 848 consecutive gastric biopsy cases across three NHS Health Boards was processed using a commercial AI platform. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against standard-of-care clinical reference diagnoses. Post-analytic cross-tabulation simulated dynamic AI-driven worklist prioritisation to quantify triage safety, false-positive alerts, and turnaround time impact across urgent and routine pathways. Results: For gastric malignancies (n = 40), the AI platform achieved a sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI: 91.2–100.0%; AUC 0.986) and a specificity of 97.2% (95% CI: 95.8–98.1%). Sensitivities for low-grade dysplasia/adenoma (n = 12) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (n = 98) were 100.0% and 94.9%, respectively. The AI review functioned as a parallel safety net, capturing eight primary lesions missed during routine human evaluation, including one occult adenocarcinoma. In workflow simulation, the platform correctly prioritised 100.0% of cancers, including 6 cancers hidden within routine backlogs, and 97.2% (106/109) of high-risk non-cancer precursors, with false-positive alerts in 4.6% (39/848) of all cases. Conclusions: AI-assisted gastric pathology review demonstrates exceptional diagnostic accuracy, acts as a reliable clinical support tool, and enables effective risk-stratified triage. Deploying AI triage in public healthcare infrastructure offers a scalable solution with the potential to reduce diagnostic backlogs and accelerate treatment for high-risk oncology patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16213553
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence-Based Triage and Diagnostic Support for Gastric Biopsies: A Multi-Centre Prospective Evaluation Across NHS Wales

Simone Ambrogio, Giuseppe Mallel, Namor W. Williams, Manuela Vecsler et al.
4 links
Diagnostics
AI in cancer detection
article

Artificial Intelligence-Based Triage and Diagnostic Support for Gastric Biopsies: A Multi-Centre Prospective Evaluation Across NHS Wales

Simone Ambrogio, Giuseppe Mallel, Namor W. Williams, Manuela Vecsler, Pearl Huey, Rachel Mikulinsky, Maya Grinwald, Chaim Linhart, Dyfrig Mason, Angela Phillips, Vincent Onyekwelu, Andrew Powell, Muhammad Aslam
article en

Abstract

Background: Histopathology workforce shortages and operational backlogs severely delay gastric cancer reporting. This multi-centre prospective evaluation assessed the diagnostic accuracy, clinical safety-net utility, and workflow triaging efficiency of an artificial intelligence (AI) platform for gastric biopsies across NHS Wales. Methods: A prospective cohort of 848 consecutive gastric biopsy cases across three NHS Health Boards was processed using a commercial AI platform. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against standard-of-care clinical reference diagnoses. Post-analytic cross-tabulation simulated dynamic AI-driven worklist prioritisation to quantify triage safety, false-positive alerts, and turnaround time impact across urgent and routine pathways. Results: For gastric malignancies (n = 40), the AI platform achieved a sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI: 91.2–100.0%; AUC 0.986) and a specificity of 97.2% (95% CI: 95.8–98.1%). Sensitivities for low-grade dysplasia/adenoma (n = 12) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (n = 98) were 100.0% and 94.9%, respectively. The AI review functioned as a parallel safety net, capturing eight primary lesions missed during routine human evaluation, including one occult adenocarcinoma. In workflow simulation, the platform correctly prioritised 100.0% of cancers, including 6 cancers hidden within routine backlogs, and 97.2% (106/109) of high-risk non-cancer precursors, with false-positive alerts in 4.6% (39/848) of all cases. Conclusions: AI-assisted gastric pathology review demonstrates exceptional diagnostic accuracy, acts as a reliable clinical support tool, and enables effective risk-stratified triage. Deploying AI triage in public healthcare infrastructure offers a scalable solution with the potential to reduce diagnostic backlogs and accelerate treatment for high-risk oncology patients.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(21)
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (GB), Swansea Bay University Health Board (GB), Hywel Dda University Health Board (GB)
Llywodraeth Cymru
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon