Fragmented Regionalism: ECOWAS, the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) and the Contest for West African Reintegration

The withdrawal of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso from ECOWAS in January 2024 following the formation of the Alliance for Sahel States (AES) is a significant challenge to West African regional integration. Therefore, this study examines the factors contributing to the fragmentation, prospects and challenges of reintegration. The study is anchored in Regional Security Complex Theory by Barry Buzan and Ole Waever (2003). Qualitative research design, through thematic/content analysis, was employed to analyze primary documents, such as the ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance (2001), Liptako-Gourma Charter (2023), and the ECOWAS Joint Statement of Withdrawal (2024), the Extraordinary Summit of the ECOWAS (ECOWAS, 2024), and secondary academic literature. The analysis showed political, security, economic, institutional, and external regional fragmentation factors, such as bias on the part of ECOWAS in upholding democracy, economic dependence on the former colonial masters, inability of the ECOWAS to tackle insecurities in the Sahel, inadequacy of ECOWAS protocols in addressing crisis, and the external-partnership supports from Russia, China, and Turkey. The prospects for reintegration include ECOWAS open door for dialogue and certain considerations; possible disenchantment with the military regimes from the people; etc. Lastly, reintegration can be problematic because the relationship between the ECOWAS and AES states has gone sour. Secondly, the AES countries might feel emboldened by the external partnerships from Russia, China, and Turkey. The challenges for reintegration, however, include soured bilateral relations and the possibility of being emboldened by the external partnerships. The study concludes that though immediate reintegration seems unlikely, sustained diplomatic engagement, calibrated sanctions, and selective security operations could transform the current fragmentation into an institutional renewal of ECOWAS. Therefore, it recommends that the ECOWAS should adopt hybrid strategy of principled pragmatism that marries democratic norms with the pragmatic demand of regional stability

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vegueta Anuario de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23720182
Primary Topic
Global Political and Social Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fragmented Regionalism: ECOWAS, the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) and the Contest for West African Reintegration

Olawale OlaoyeElijah
6 links
Vegueta Anuario de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia
Global Political and Social Dynamics
article

Fragmented Regionalism: ECOWAS, the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) and the Contest for West African Reintegration

Olawale OlaoyeElijah
article en

Abstract

The withdrawal of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso from ECOWAS in January 2024 following the formation of the Alliance for Sahel States (AES) is a significant challenge to West African regional integration. Therefore, this study examines the factors contributing to the fragmentation, prospects and challenges of reintegration. The study is anchored in Regional Security Complex Theory by Barry Buzan and Ole Waever (2003). Qualitative research design, through thematic/content analysis, was employed to analyze primary documents, such as the ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance (2001), Liptako-Gourma Charter (2023), and the ECOWAS Joint Statement of Withdrawal (2024), the Extraordinary Summit of the ECOWAS (ECOWAS, 2024), and secondary academic literature. The analysis showed political, security, economic, institutional, and external regional fragmentation factors, such as bias on the part of ECOWAS in upholding democracy, economic dependence on the former colonial masters, inability of the ECOWAS to tackle insecurities in the Sahel, inadequacy of ECOWAS protocols in addressing crisis, and the external-partnership supports from Russia, China, and Turkey. The prospects for reintegration include ECOWAS open door for dialogue and certain considerations; possible disenchantment with the military regimes from the people; etc. Lastly, reintegration can be problematic because the relationship between the ECOWAS and AES states has gone sour. Secondly, the AES countries might feel emboldened by the external partnerships from Russia, China, and Turkey. The challenges for reintegration, however, include soured bilateral relations and the possibility of being emboldened by the external partnerships. The study concludes that though immediate reintegration seems unlikely, sustained diplomatic engagement, calibrated sanctions, and selective security operations could transform the current fragmentation into an institutional renewal of ECOWAS. Therefore, it recommends that the ECOWAS should adopt hybrid strategy of principled pragmatism that marries democratic norms with the pragmatic demand of regional stability

Vegueta Anuario de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Political and Social Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon