Lead-pattern potentials and exact values of merging networks

Let M(m,n) be the least number of comparators in a network that merges sorted lists of lengths m and n. We prove M(5,7) = 18, M(6,8) = 22, M(6,9) = 25, M(7,9) = 27 and M(5,15) = 35, five values listed as open in 2009, together with M(5,10) = 25, M(5,11) = 27, M(5,12) = 29 and M(6,10) = 27, for which we know of no published determination. In all nine cases Batcher's odd-even merge is optimal. Each lead of a network computes a monotone Boolean function of its input, and a comparator replaces two such functions by their disjunction and conjunction, so a potential on these functions that grows by at most one at each comparator bounds the size of the network from below. The best such bound is the optimum of a linear program. For merging networks its solutions round to exact rational certificates, which two separately written programs check, and the nine values are also proved in Lean 4, partly by compiled code. Closed-form potentials give new proofs of the formulas for M(2,n) and M(3,n), of the odd cases of M(4,n), and of Iwata's linear coefficient. The certificates, the checkers and the logs of all computations are archived as doi:10.5281/zenodo.23719457, and the Lean proofs as doi:10.5281/zenodo.23719459. Mathematics Subject Classification (2020): 68P10 (primary); 68Q06, 90C05 (secondary).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23719452
Primary Topic
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Lead-pattern potentials and exact values of merging networks

Tejasvi Singh Tomar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
preprint

Lead-pattern potentials and exact values of merging networks

Tejasvi Singh Tomar
preprint en

Abstract

Let M(m,n) be the least number of comparators in a network that merges sorted lists of lengths m and n. We prove M(5,7) = 18, M(6,8) = 22, M(6,9) = 25, M(7,9) = 27 and M(5,15) = 35, five values listed as open in 2009, together with M(5,10) = 25, M(5,11) = 27, M(5,12) = 29 and M(6,10) = 27, for which we know of no published determination. In all nine cases Batcher's odd-even merge is optimal. Each lead of a network computes a monotone Boolean function of its input, and a comparator replaces two such functions by their disjunction and conjunction, so a potential on these functions that grows by at most one at each comparator bounds the size of the network from below. The best such bound is the optimum of a linear program. For merging networks its solutions round to exact rational certificates, which two separately written programs check, and the nine values are also proved in Lean 4, partly by compiled code. Closed-form potentials give new proofs of the formulas for M(2,n) and M(3,n), of the odd cases of M(4,n), and of Iwata's linear coefficient. The certificates, the checkers and the logs of all computations are archived as doi:10.5281/zenodo.23719457, and the Lean proofs as doi:10.5281/zenodo.23719459. Mathematics Subject Classification (2020): 68P10 (primary); 68Q06, 90C05 (secondary).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Lead-pattern potentials and exact values of merging networks — Tejasvi Singh Tomar · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS