When ‘national growth’ means royal power: court-centred monarchy, national identity, and the politics of development

This article examines how development constructs national identity in a court-centred monarchy by distinguishing growth claims from the criterion by which national advance is defined. It analyses thirty rule-defined Moroccan royal addresses (2011–2025), in Arabic, alongside an institutional counter-corpus; descriptive counts use twenty-seven recoverable coding records without imputation. The evidence supports bounded royalisation without monopoly: governmental and specialised institutions exercise substantive developmental agency, while the hereditary, supra-governmental centre recurrently authorises, recalibrates, and nationally frames overarching direction. The New Development Model provides a strong counter-case, and a bounded comparison with Egypt distinguishes this configuration from leader-centred developmental rhetoric.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
National Identities
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2026.2746342
Primary Topic
Cultural and political discourse analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When ‘national growth’ means royal power: court-centred monarchy, national identity, and the politics of development

Mohsen Safarelahi
2 links
National Identities
Cultural and political discourse analysis
article

When ‘national growth’ means royal power: court-centred monarchy, national identity, and the politics of development

Mohsen Safarelahi
article en

Abstract

This article examines how development constructs national identity in a court-centred monarchy by distinguishing growth claims from the criterion by which national advance is defined. It analyses thirty rule-defined Moroccan royal addresses (2011–2025), in Arabic, alongside an institutional counter-corpus; descriptive counts use twenty-seven recoverable coding records without imputation. The evidence supports bounded royalisation without monopoly: governmental and specialised institutions exercise substantive developmental agency, while the hereditary, supra-governmental centre recurrently authorises, recalibrates, and nationally frames overarching direction. The New Development Model provides a strong counter-case, and a bounded comparison with Egypt distinguishes this configuration from leader-centred developmental rhetoric.

National Identities
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cultural and political discourse analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon