Best Practice Guidelines for Bioethical Use of Medical AI in Healthcare. An eDelphi Consensus Exercise

Abstract Introduction Medical Artificial Intelligence (MAI) is transforming healthcare but raises significant ethical concerns. Despite emerging principles and regulations, to our knowledge, no standardized clinical bioethics framework exists to guide MAI practice. Objective This Delphi study sought global expert agreement on ethical challenges, principles, guidelines, and practical tools for MAI use. Method A four-round international eDelphi study, conducted under ACCORD and DELPHISTAR guidance, engaged multidisciplinary stakeholders identified through systematic review and targeted recruitment. Preliminary items were evidence-derived and iteratively refined. Consensus (≥ 80% agreement across two rounds) was predefined. Surveys were anonymized and randomized. Ethical approval and protocol registration were secured before study initiation. Results The panel included 53 participants from 21 countries. Survey rounds started November 2025 and ended February 2026. 170 items were considered. 132 reached consensus. Items were classified into bioethical issues, values, principles, solutions, a checklist for clinicians, and report markers for risk management. Discussion This study produced clinician-focused practice guidelines for the bioethical use of MAI. Ethical components aligned with prior literature, while no new bioethical principles met consensus. Limitations included geographic imbalance and stakeholder representation. Recommendations emphasized human responsibility, governance, and practical implementation tools. Conclusion This Delphi consensus provides practical, ethics-based guidance for the responsible integration of MAI into clinical practice and institutional governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01557-6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best Practice Guidelines for Bioethical Use of Medical AI in Healthcare. An eDelphi Consensus Exercise

Constantine S. Psimopoulos, Sandeep Reddy, Sharon Chiang, María Soledad Paladino et al.
4 links
BMC Medical Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Best Practice Guidelines for Bioethical Use of Medical AI in Healthcare. An eDelphi Consensus Exercise

Constantine S. Psimopoulos, Sandeep Reddy, Sharon Chiang, María Soledad Paladino, Jason T. Eberl, Vicente Bellver Capella, Patrici Calvo, Thomas Ploug, Ram oacute n J. Palmer-Coll, Miguel Cortijo-Martinez, Verónica A. Brokke, Andrzej Grzybowski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Medical Artificial Intelligence (MAI) is transforming healthcare but raises significant ethical concerns. Despite emerging principles and regulations, to our knowledge, no standardized clinical bioethics framework exists to guide MAI practice. Objective This Delphi study sought global expert agreement on ethical challenges, principles, guidelines, and practical tools for MAI use. Method A four-round international eDelphi study, conducted under ACCORD and DELPHISTAR guidance, engaged multidisciplinary stakeholders identified through systematic review and targeted recruitment. Preliminary items were evidence-derived and iteratively refined. Consensus (≥ 80% agreement across two rounds) was predefined. Surveys were anonymized and randomized. Ethical approval and protocol registration were secured before study initiation. Results The panel included 53 participants from 21 countries. Survey rounds started November 2025 and ended February 2026. 170 items were considered. 132 reached consensus. Items were classified into bioethical issues, values, principles, solutions, a checklist for clinicians, and report markers for risk management. Discussion This study produced clinician-focused practice guidelines for the bioethical use of MAI. Ethical components aligned with prior literature, while no new bioethical principles met consensus. Limitations included geographic imbalance and stakeholder representation. Recommendations emphasized human responsibility, governance, and practical implementation tools. Conclusion This Delphi consensus provides practical, ethics-based guidance for the responsible integration of MAI into clinical practice and institutional governance.

BMC Medical Ethics
Universitat Jaume I (ES), Harvard University (US), Universitat de València (ES), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of California, San Francisco (US), Austral University (AR), Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU (ES), Foundation for the Development of Ophthalmology (PL), Saint Louis University (US), University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL), Aalborg University (DK), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon