Incidental findings in ultrasound examinations: An exploratory study of the perspectives and experiences of sonographers in two Nordic countries

INTRODUCTION: In ultrasound scans, incidental findings (IFs) are unexpected findings of abnormalities with potential clinical impact. Sonographers face many challenges in clinical practice, including identifying and interpreting IFs. This study sought to explore sonographers' perceptions and experiences with IFs, and the strategies they use to handle them effectively. METHODS: We performed focus group discussions with nine trained sonographers in Denmark and five in Norway. The group discussions were conducted using a discussion guide with open-ended questions about the training and education of participating sonographers, how they handle and report on incidental findings, collaborate with colleagues to consult on IFs, other sources of information used in detecting and handling IFs, and how to communicate with patients on IFs, as well as the ethics involved in the process. Participants discussed their knowledge of, and experiences with handling IFs. Audio-recording of each discussion was, transcribed, and analysed following Braun & Clarke's thematic framework. RESULTS: Fourteen sonographers with 0.5-28 years of sonography experience participated. Analysis generated three overarching themes and six subthemes. The three themes described: 1) preparedness through education and training to identify and interpret IFs; 2) uncertainty and lack of confidence regarding reporting and follow-up procedures; and 3) challenges in communicating IFs to patients. Participants perceived these challenges as contributing to diagnostic delays, legal vulnerability, and emotional distress. CONCLUSION: Sonographers described uncertainty in the identification, interpretation, reporting, and communication of IFs, reflecting challenges in education and local practice in Denmark and Norway. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Clear clinical protocols for identifying and reporting IFs may support consistent practice, enhance patient safety, and improve communication in ultrasound services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiography
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2026.103608
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidental findings in ultrasound examinations: An exploratory study of the perspectives and experiences of sonographers in two Nordic countries

Malene Roland Vils Pedersen, Karen Brage, Sheldon Bailey, H. Peoples et al.
Radiography
Radiology practices and education
article

Incidental findings in ultrasound examinations: An exploratory study of the perspectives and experiences of sonographers in two Nordic countries

Malene Roland Vils Pedersen, Karen Brage, Sheldon Bailey, H. Peoples, S.A. Bailey, N. Hanger
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In ultrasound scans, incidental findings (IFs) are unexpected findings of abnormalities with potential clinical impact. Sonographers face many challenges in clinical practice, including identifying and interpreting IFs. This study sought to explore sonographers' perceptions and experiences with IFs, and the strategies they use to handle them effectively. METHODS: We performed focus group discussions with nine trained sonographers in Denmark and five in Norway. The group discussions were conducted using a discussion guide with open-ended questions about the training and education of participating sonographers, how they handle and report on incidental findings, collaborate with colleagues to consult on IFs, other sources of information used in detecting and handling IFs, and how to communicate with patients on IFs, as well as the ethics involved in the process. Participants discussed their knowledge of, and experiences with handling IFs. Audio-recording of each discussion was, transcribed, and analysed following Braun & Clarke's thematic framework. RESULTS: Fourteen sonographers with 0.5-28 years of sonography experience participated. Analysis generated three overarching themes and six subthemes. The three themes described: 1) preparedness through education and training to identify and interpret IFs; 2) uncertainty and lack of confidence regarding reporting and follow-up procedures; and 3) challenges in communicating IFs to patients. Participants perceived these challenges as contributing to diagnostic delays, legal vulnerability, and emotional distress. CONCLUSION: Sonographers described uncertainty in the identification, interpretation, reporting, and communication of IFs, reflecting challenges in education and local practice in Denmark and Norway. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Clear clinical protocols for identifying and reporting IFs may support consistent practice, enhance patient safety, and improve communication in ultrasound services.

RadiographyVol. 32(8)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Burman University (CA), Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (CA), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), University College Lillebaelt (DK), VIA University College (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon