Innovation and Competition on a Rugged Technological Landscape

We integrate innovation into Hotelling's classic model of spatial competition. Potential entrants arrive sequentially and choose whether and where to innovate. They can innovate beyond the frontier, expanding the boundary of the market, or within a niche between incumbent products. Product quality is learned only after introduction, and uncertainty increases with novelty. Innovation on a rugged technological landscape is irregular, with frequent changes in direction and cycles between frontier and niche innovation. The ruggedness of the technological landscape itself deters innovation, generating fewer entrants, less product differentiation, narrower markets, and more intense competition than under certainty. (JEL D11, D21, D83, L11, L25, O31)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Microeconomics
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20230266
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovation and Competition on a Rugged Technological Landscape

Niko Matouschek Z, Nicolas S. Lambert, Steven Callander
American Economic Journal Microeconomics
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Innovation and Competition on a Rugged Technological Landscape

Niko Matouschek Z, Nicolas S. Lambert, Steven Callander
article en

Abstract

We integrate innovation into Hotelling's classic model of spatial competition. Potential entrants arrive sequentially and choose whether and where to innovate. They can innovate beyond the frontier, expanding the boundary of the market, or within a niche between incumbent products. Product quality is learned only after introduction, and uncertainty increases with novelty. Innovation on a rugged technological landscape is irregular, with frequent changes in direction and cycles between frontier and niche innovation. The ruggedness of the technological landscape itself deters innovation, generating fewer entrants, less product differentiation, narrower markets, and more intense competition than under certainty. (JEL D11, D21, D83, L11, L25, O31)

American Economic Journal MicroeconomicsVol. 18(4)
Northwestern University (US), University of Southern California (US), Stanford University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon