HOW DOES DIGITAL TWIN–BLOCKCHAIN INTEGRATION ENHANCE TRACEABILITY TRUST? A PHYSICAL–DIGITAL–TRUST TRIPLE MAPPING MODEL

Agricultural traceability increasingly combines digital twins with distributed ledgers, yet the two technologies are often treated as if co-deployment were enough to create trust. This paper challenges that assumption. It treats traceability trust as the result of three linked translations: physical events into a digital representation (representational fidelity), that representation into a tamper-evident record (evidential integrity), and the record into evidence that stakeholders can inspect and understand (verification confidence). Using affordance theory, signaling theory and the trust literature, the paper explains why these translations operate sequentially, why a weak translation can produce false assurance, and why consumers, firms and regulators attach different weights to the three qualities. Nine propositions and a focused research agenda follow from the argument. The contribution is a configurational account that connects traceability design to the judgments stakeholders make about provenance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Management Science
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61784/wms3129
Primary Topic
Food Supply Chain Traceability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HOW DOES DIGITAL TWIN–BLOCKCHAIN INTEGRATION ENHANCE TRACEABILITY TRUST? A PHYSICAL–DIGITAL–TRUST TRIPLE MAPPING MODEL

LiXia Lei, LiJuan Wang, Mang Ba
4 links
World Journal of Management Science
Food Supply Chain Traceability
article

HOW DOES DIGITAL TWIN–BLOCKCHAIN INTEGRATION ENHANCE TRACEABILITY TRUST? A PHYSICAL–DIGITAL–TRUST TRIPLE MAPPING MODEL

LiXia Lei, LiJuan Wang, Mang Ba
article en

Abstract

Agricultural traceability increasingly combines digital twins with distributed ledgers, yet the two technologies are often treated as if co-deployment were enough to create trust. This paper challenges that assumption. It treats traceability trust as the result of three linked translations: physical events into a digital representation (representational fidelity), that representation into a tamper-evident record (evidential integrity), and the record into evidence that stakeholders can inspect and understand (verification confidence). Using affordance theory, signaling theory and the trust literature, the paper explains why these translations operate sequentially, why a weak translation can produce false assurance, and why consumers, firms and regulators attach different weights to the three qualities. Nine propositions and a focused research agenda follow from the argument. The contribution is a configurational account that connects traceability design to the judgments stakeholders make about provenance.

World Journal of Management ScienceVol. 4(6)
Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Food Supply Chain Traceability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon