Exploring Art Appreciation Across Three Virtual Museum Configurations: Do Experience Patterns Differ by Formal Art Education?

This exploratory study examines how art appreciation varies across three virtual museum configurations, particularly the White Cube, Traditional Museum, and Contextualized Configurations, and whether participants’ experiential patterns differ according to their formal art education. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study integrates quantitative findings across six dimensions of aesthetic experiences with qualitative insights into the perception of composition, color, and detail. Examining the role of participants’ formal art education provides insights into how individuals with different educational backgrounds draw on perceptual, spatial, and interpretive cues. Based on these findings, the study identifies two complementary areas of design implications to support virtual art appreciation: configuration-level design considerations and participant-informed design opportunities, encompassing perpetual scaffolding, interpretive layering, analytical exploration, environmental context, and flexible flow. These implications suggest potential strategies for offering more inclusive virtual museum experiences that could accommodate different educational backgrounds and engagement preferences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34827295
Primary Topic
Museums and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Art Appreciation Across Three Virtual Museum Configurations: Do Experience Patterns Differ by Formal Art Education?

Kyung Taek Oh, Hyeseung Shim, Chung-Kon Shi
2 links
Figshare
Museums and Cultural Heritage
article

Exploring Art Appreciation Across Three Virtual Museum Configurations: Do Experience Patterns Differ by Formal Art Education?

Kyung Taek Oh, Hyeseung Shim, Chung-Kon Shi
article en

Abstract

This exploratory study examines how art appreciation varies across three virtual museum configurations, particularly the White Cube, Traditional Museum, and Contextualized Configurations, and whether participants’ experiential patterns differ according to their formal art education. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study integrates quantitative findings across six dimensions of aesthetic experiences with qualitative insights into the perception of composition, color, and detail. Examining the role of participants’ formal art education provides insights into how individuals with different educational backgrounds draw on perceptual, spatial, and interpretive cues. Based on these findings, the study identifies two complementary areas of design implications to support virtual art appreciation: configuration-level design considerations and participant-informed design opportunities, encompassing perpetual scaffolding, interpretive layering, analytical exploration, environmental context, and flexible flow. These implications suggest potential strategies for offering more inclusive virtual museum experiences that could accommodate different educational backgrounds and engagement preferences.

Figshare
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Museums and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Exploring Art Appreciation Across Three Virtual Museum Configurations: Do Experience Patterns Differ by Formal Art Education? — Kyung Taek Oh, Hyeseung Shim, et al. · Figshare (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS