Everyday dynasticism: monuments, objects, and family in the Roman empire

Abstract This article examines how dynastic ideas manifested in Roman monuments and in the objects which formed a part of everyday life. These objects include glass phalerae depicting Germanicus and his children worn by soldiers, provincial coins showing the twin sons of Drusus Caesar, bread moulds with the image of the Severan imperial family sacrificing, and terracotta souvenirs of the Tetrarchs. It will argue that it was through these small, everyday objects, and their interactions with the Roman people, just as much as in imperial speeches and portrait busts, that ‘the dynastic’ was constructed in the Roman world. These objects enabled non-familial relationships and configurations to be portrayed as familial, and for ties of blood and kinship to be conceived as the natural order for political replication, transcending the constant phenomenon of usurpation by providing reassuring images of stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bics/qbag043
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Everyday dynasticism: monuments, objects, and family in the Roman empire

Caillan Davenport
1 links
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Everyday dynasticism: monuments, objects, and family in the Roman empire

Caillan Davenport
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how dynastic ideas manifested in Roman monuments and in the objects which formed a part of everyday life. These objects include glass phalerae depicting Germanicus and his children worn by soldiers, provincial coins showing the twin sons of Drusus Caesar, bread moulds with the image of the Severan imperial family sacrificing, and terracotta souvenirs of the Tetrarchs. It will argue that it was through these small, everyday objects, and their interactions with the Roman people, just as much as in imperial speeches and portrait busts, that ‘the dynastic’ was constructed in the Roman world. These objects enabled non-familial relationships and configurations to be portrayed as familial, and for ties of blood and kinship to be conceived as the natural order for political replication, transcending the constant phenomenon of usurpation by providing reassuring images of stability.

Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Australian National University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon