Competitive Bottlenecks and Platform Spillovers

We provide a general framework to analyze competition between oligopolistic platforms in competitive bottleneck settings, allowing for pricing and nonprice design choices by platforms, and post-participation buyer-seller decisions. We show that equilibrium choices by platforms are distorted against sellers’ interests in a way harmful to welfare (e.g., setting excessive commission fees), and that an increase in the number of competing platforms can exacerbate this distortion. We also characterize how buyer-side heterogeneity in interaction benefits, partial market coverage, platform asymmetry, and cross-platform spillovers further amplify or mitigate welfare distortions. Based on our findings, we discuss policy implications for mobile app platforms. (JEL D43, L13, L25, L96)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Microeconomics
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20240259
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competitive Bottlenecks and Platform Spillovers

Julian Wright, Tat‐How Teh
American Economic Journal Microeconomics
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Competitive Bottlenecks and Platform Spillovers

Julian Wright, Tat‐How Teh
article en

Abstract

We provide a general framework to analyze competition between oligopolistic platforms in competitive bottleneck settings, allowing for pricing and nonprice design choices by platforms, and post-participation buyer-seller decisions. We show that equilibrium choices by platforms are distorted against sellers’ interests in a way harmful to welfare (e.g., setting excessive commission fees), and that an increase in the number of competing platforms can exacerbate this distortion. We also characterize how buyer-side heterogeneity in interaction benefits, partial market coverage, platform asymmetry, and cross-platform spillovers further amplify or mitigate welfare distortions. Based on our findings, we discuss policy implications for mobile app platforms. (JEL D43, L13, L25, L96)

American Economic Journal MicroeconomicsVol. 18(4)
National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon