Marx and Engels on the Lumpenproletariat and the Poor Laws

What if the English Poor Laws helped reproduce the social conditions Marx and Engels associated with the lumpenproletariat? This paper argues that their critique of the Poor Laws and their concept of the lumpenproletariat form part of a common analysis of capitalist accumulation and the production of relative surplus population. Marx and Engels understood poor relief as a mechanism embedded in capitalist reproduction, stabilising dependency, exerting downward pressure on wages, and fragmenting the working class. The lumpenproletariat, situated at the lowest strata of pauperism, serves as a conceptual bridge between surplus population and the institutional regulation of poverty. By clarifying this connection, the article repositions Marx and Engels within nineteenth-century debates on poverty and highlights their divergence from classical political economy, particularly regarding the structural limits of reform within capitalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2026.2723958
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marx and Engels on the Lumpenproletariat and the Poor Laws

Stéphanie Laguérodie, Victor Bianchini
1 links
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Marx and Engels on the Lumpenproletariat and the Poor Laws

Stéphanie Laguérodie, Victor Bianchini
article en

Abstract

What if the English Poor Laws helped reproduce the social conditions Marx and Engels associated with the lumpenproletariat? This paper argues that their critique of the Poor Laws and their concept of the lumpenproletariat form part of a common analysis of capitalist accumulation and the production of relative surplus population. Marx and Engels understood poor relief as a mechanism embedded in capitalist reproduction, stabilising dependency, exerting downward pressure on wages, and fragmenting the working class. The lumpenproletariat, situated at the lowest strata of pauperism, serves as a conceptual bridge between surplus population and the institutional regulation of poverty. By clarifying this connection, the article repositions Marx and Engels within nineteenth-century debates on poverty and highlights their divergence from classical political economy, particularly regarding the structural limits of reform within capitalism.

European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon