Comparative phytochemical analysis of Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr. ethanol and aqueous extracts using UHPLC-MS/mS combined with feature-based molecular networking

Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr. (HS) is a medicinal plant belonging to the Cannabaceae family and widely distributed in East Asia. Although it has been traditionally used for health-related purposes, its phytochemical profile remains incompletely characterized, particularly regarding how different extraction solvents influence bioactive compounds. Water and ethanol are the two most commonly used solvents in herbal medicine and food processing. Water extraction reflects traditional decoction practices, while ethanol extraction is widely used in modern studies due to its ability to extract a broader range of compounds. Therefore, comparing these two solvents is important for linking traditional use with modern functional food development. In this study, UHPLC-MS/MS combined with feature-based molecular networking was applied to compare ethanol and aqueous extracts of HS. A total of 164 compounds were annotated in the ethanol extract and 136 in the aqueous extract, with 51 compounds shared. Statistical analysis revealed that N-p-coumaroyltyramine, feruloyltyramine, and arginine were significantly enriched in the ethanol extract. Although the two extraction methods exhibited largely overlapping phytochemical profiles, ethanol extraction provided broader metabolite coverage and preferentially enriched these three discriminatory metabolites. These findings provide a basis for selecting appropriate extraction methods and support the development of HS-derived functional foods and nutraceuticals. Phytochemical profiles of HS ethanol and aqueous extracts were compared using UHPLC-MS/MS coupled with feature-based molecular networking.A total of 164 bioactive constituents were annotated in the ethanol extract and 136 in the aqueous extract, with 51 compounds common to both.Ethanol extraction resulted in a greater diversity of bioactive constituents compared with aqueous extraction.N-p-coumaroyltyramine, feruloyltyramine, and arginine were significantly enriched in the ethanol extract. Phytochemical profiles of HS ethanol and aqueous extracts were compared using UHPLC-MS/MS coupled with feature-based molecular networking. A total of 164 bioactive constituents were annotated in the ethanol extract and 136 in the aqueous extract, with 51 compounds common to both. Ethanol extraction resulted in a greater diversity of bioactive constituents compared with aqueous extraction. N-p-coumaroyltyramine, feruloyltyramine, and arginine were significantly enriched in the ethanol extract.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34832876
Primary Topic
Plant chemical constituents analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative phytochemical analysis of Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr. ethanol and aqueous extracts using UHPLC-MS/mS combined with feature-based molecular networking

Cheng Ji Li, Shaoyong Xu, Desheng Li, De Xin Dang et al.
3 links
Figshare
Plant chemical constituents analysis
article

Comparative phytochemical analysis of Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr. ethanol and aqueous extracts using UHPLC-MS/mS combined with feature-based molecular networking

Cheng Ji Li, Shaoyong Xu, Desheng Li, De Xin Dang, Huan Wang, Jing Yang
article en

Abstract

Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr. (HS) is a medicinal plant belonging to the Cannabaceae family and widely distributed in East Asia. Although it has been traditionally used for health-related purposes, its phytochemical profile remains incompletely characterized, particularly regarding how different extraction solvents influence bioactive compounds. Water and ethanol are the two most commonly used solvents in herbal medicine and food processing. Water extraction reflects traditional decoction practices, while ethanol extraction is widely used in modern studies due to its ability to extract a broader range of compounds. Therefore, comparing these two solvents is important for linking traditional use with modern functional food development. In this study, UHPLC-MS/MS combined with feature-based molecular networking was applied to compare ethanol and aqueous extracts of HS. A total of 164 compounds were annotated in the ethanol extract and 136 in the aqueous extract, with 51 compounds shared. Statistical analysis revealed that N-p-coumaroyltyramine, feruloyltyramine, and arginine were significantly enriched in the ethanol extract. Although the two extraction methods exhibited largely overlapping phytochemical profiles, ethanol extraction provided broader metabolite coverage and preferentially enriched these three discriminatory metabolites. These findings provide a basis for selecting appropriate extraction methods and support the development of HS-derived functional foods and nutraceuticals. Phytochemical profiles of HS ethanol and aqueous extracts were compared using UHPLC-MS/MS coupled with feature-based molecular networking.A total of 164 bioactive constituents were annotated in the ethanol extract and 136 in the aqueous extract, with 51 compounds common to both.Ethanol extraction resulted in a greater diversity of bioactive constituents compared with aqueous extraction.N-p-coumaroyltyramine, feruloyltyramine, and arginine were significantly enriched in the ethanol extract. Phytochemical profiles of HS ethanol and aqueous extracts were compared using UHPLC-MS/MS coupled with feature-based molecular networking. A total of 164 bioactive constituents were annotated in the ethanol extract and 136 in the aqueous extract, with 51 compounds common to both. Ethanol extraction resulted in a greater diversity of bioactive constituents compared with aqueous extraction. N-p-coumaroyltyramine, feruloyltyramine, and arginine were significantly enriched in the ethanol extract.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Plant chemical constituents analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon