Reforming medical device regulation in Europe: centralization, governance, and the case for an EU medical device agency

Innovation in medical technologies, especially AI-enabled tools, is exposing the limits of Europe's current medical device regulatory dogma. Existing rules treat devices as isolated products rather than integrated systems shaping care. Any region that wants to be home to the most innovative businesses and technologies must have a regulatory system fit for adopting state-of-the-art technologies and making fast, effective decisions. While US and UK frameworks innovate, Europe's model stifles medical-technology innovation and the exploration of new regulatory paradigms through ineffective multi-level governance and uncoordinated, decentralized decision-making. In response, MedTech stakeholders, including industry, professional associations, patient representatives, hospitals, politicians, national authorities, and regulatory scientists, have recently called for a centralised EU-level "single-authority" (for strategy-setting, coordination, and regulatory support) to take accountable ownership of the regulatory system and its strategic development for all medical technologies in Europe. We describe the benefits and drawbacks of this approach and contend how centralization in the complex MedTech system could actually work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101908
Primary Topic
Healthcare Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reforming medical device regulation in Europe: centralization, governance, and the case for an EU medical device agency

Timo Minssen, Stephen Gilbert, Anett Schönfelder, Tom Melvin
2 links
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Healthcare Regulation
article

Reforming medical device regulation in Europe: centralization, governance, and the case for an EU medical device agency

Timo Minssen, Stephen Gilbert, Anett Schönfelder, Tom Melvin
article en

Abstract

Innovation in medical technologies, especially AI-enabled tools, is exposing the limits of Europe's current medical device regulatory dogma. Existing rules treat devices as isolated products rather than integrated systems shaping care. Any region that wants to be home to the most innovative businesses and technologies must have a regulatory system fit for adopting state-of-the-art technologies and making fast, effective decisions. While US and UK frameworks innovate, Europe's model stifles medical-technology innovation and the exploration of new regulatory paradigms through ineffective multi-level governance and uncoordinated, decentralized decision-making. In response, MedTech stakeholders, including industry, professional associations, patient representatives, hospitals, politicians, national authorities, and regulatory scientists, have recently called for a centralised EU-level "single-authority" (for strategy-setting, coordination, and regulatory support) to take accountable ownership of the regulatory system and its strategic development for all medical technologies in Europe. We describe the benefits and drawbacks of this approach and contend how centralization in the complex MedTech system could actually work.

The Lancet Regional Health - EuropeVol. 72
University of Copenhagen (DK), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Trials Methodology Research Network (IE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
European Commission, Novo Nordisk Fonden
Good health and well-being, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon