Bridging Clinical Prediction and Workplace Exposure: A Data-Driven Risk Stratification and Prediction Model for Occupational Respiratory Diseases.

Abstract Occupational respiratory disease (ORD) surveillance remains largely reactive, with diagnosis often occurring only after clinically significant symptoms develop. Existing risk stratification tools are primarily clinically derived and rarely incorporate occupational exposure variables such as exposure intensity, duration, and workplace hazards, limiting early identification of at-risk workers. This review synthesizes current evidence on predictive modelling and risk stratification tools for respiratory diseases, evaluates their applicability to occupational health, and proposes a data-driven framework for proactive risk stratification. A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2021 and 2025. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms related to occupational respiratory diseases, predictive modelling, prognostic tools, and occupational exposure assessment were combined using Boolean operators. Extracted data included study characteristics, modelling approaches, predictors, and model performance metrics, which were narratively synthesized using thematic mapping. Of 618 records identified, six representative evidence approaches were retained for detailed comparative synthesis. Clinical models such as BODE and DOSE provided useful prognostic information but lacked occupational exposure parameters. Exposure-based approaches showed associations between cumulative exposure and respiratory outcomes, while a meta-analysis of machine-learning models for acute respiratory distress syndrome reported a pooled AUC of 0.7407. Key predictors included age, smoking status, lung function, and exposure-related factors. Current reactive and clinically focused approaches limit effective ORD prevention. Integrating occupational exposure variables into predictive, data-driven risk stratification frameworks is essential for early identification of high-risk workers. The proposed ORDiRS framework represents a step toward proactive occupational health surveillance in industrial settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70672/n73azh75
Primary Topic
Occupational exposure and asthma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Clinical Prediction and Workplace Exposure: A Data-Driven Risk Stratification and Prediction Model for Occupational Respiratory Diseases.

Siti Munira Yasin, Mohamad Rodi Isa, Nurhuda Binti Ismail, Muhamad Syazni Mohamad Asraff et al.
Asian Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences
Occupational exposure and asthma
article

Bridging Clinical Prediction and Workplace Exposure: A Data-Driven Risk Stratification and Prediction Model for Occupational Respiratory Diseases.

Siti Munira Yasin, Mohamad Rodi Isa, Nurhuda Binti Ismail, Muhamad Syazni Mohamad Asraff, Muhammad Irfan Mohd Sallehhudin, Ely Zarina Samsuddin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Occupational respiratory disease (ORD) surveillance remains largely reactive, with diagnosis often occurring only after clinically significant symptoms develop. Existing risk stratification tools are primarily clinically derived and rarely incorporate occupational exposure variables such as exposure intensity, duration, and workplace hazards, limiting early identification of at-risk workers. This review synthesizes current evidence on predictive modelling and risk stratification tools for respiratory diseases, evaluates their applicability to occupational health, and proposes a data-driven framework for proactive risk stratification. A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2021 and 2025. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms related to occupational respiratory diseases, predictive modelling, prognostic tools, and occupational exposure assessment were combined using Boolean operators. Extracted data included study characteristics, modelling approaches, predictors, and model performance metrics, which were narratively synthesized using thematic mapping. Of 618 records identified, six representative evidence approaches were retained for detailed comparative synthesis. Clinical models such as BODE and DOSE provided useful prognostic information but lacked occupational exposure parameters. Exposure-based approaches showed associations between cumulative exposure and respiratory outcomes, while a meta-analysis of machine-learning models for acute respiratory distress syndrome reported a pooled AUC of 0.7407. Key predictors included age, smoking status, lung function, and exposure-related factors. Current reactive and clinically focused approaches limit effective ORD prevention. Integrating occupational exposure variables into predictive, data-driven risk stratification frameworks is essential for early identification of high-risk workers. The proposed ORDiRS framework represents a step toward proactive occupational health surveillance in industrial settings.

Asian Journal of Medicine & Health SciencesVol. 9(2)
Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY), Hospital Sungai Buloh (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Universiti Teknologi MARA
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Occupational exposure and asthma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon