ADAPTAÇÃO E VALIDAÇÃO DE UM INSTRUMENTO DE PERCEPÇÃO DE POLÍTICAS E PRÁTICAS DE GESTÃO PARA PROFESSORES DO ENSINO SUPERIOR

This article sought to adapt and validate an instrument for the perception of management policies and practices aimed at higher education professors, since the available instruments were designed for organisations in general and do not address the particularities of academic work. The instrument was based on two scales already validated for Brazilian organisations, with the addition of items on research incentives, publication support and the teaching career. Content and criterion validity derived from the published origin of the items, complemented by prior definition of the constructs, peer review and pre-testing. A total of 386 professors from Brazilian public and private institutions took part, answering on an interval scale based on adverbs of quantity and frequency. Internal consistency reached a Cronbach's alpha of 0.956. Exploratory factor analysis, used for the statistical validation of the constructs defined a priori, retained six factors explaining 67.3% of the accumulated variance, with a sampling adequacy of 0.948. The expected dimensions were reproduced, and the added items formed a factor of their own. It is concluded that the adapted instrument is suitable for measuring teachers' perception of institutional management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i10.30703
Primary Topic
Higher Education in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ADAPTAÇÃO E VALIDAÇÃO DE UM INSTRUMENTO DE PERCEPÇÃO DE POLÍTICAS E PRÁTICAS DE GESTÃO PARA PROFESSORES DO ENSINO SUPERIOR

Maria Geralda de Miranda, Marcelle Rossi de Mello Brandão, Daniela Rodrigues Carreira, Alex Pires Andrade et al.
1 links
Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação
Higher Education in Latin America
article

ADAPTAÇÃO E VALIDAÇÃO DE UM INSTRUMENTO DE PERCEPÇÃO DE POLÍTICAS E PRÁTICAS DE GESTÃO PARA PROFESSORES DO ENSINO SUPERIOR

Maria Geralda de Miranda, Marcelle Rossi de Mello Brandão, Daniela Rodrigues Carreira, Alex Pires Andrade, Carla Galego, Rosa Maria de Deus de Sousa
article en

Abstract

This article sought to adapt and validate an instrument for the perception of management policies and practices aimed at higher education professors, since the available instruments were designed for organisations in general and do not address the particularities of academic work. The instrument was based on two scales already validated for Brazilian organisations, with the addition of items on research incentives, publication support and the teaching career. Content and criterion validity derived from the published origin of the items, complemented by prior definition of the constructs, peer review and pre-testing. A total of 386 professors from Brazilian public and private institutions took part, answering on an interval scale based on adverbs of quantity and frequency. Internal consistency reached a Cronbach's alpha of 0.956. Exploratory factor analysis, used for the statistical validation of the constructs defined a priori, retained six factors explaining 67.3% of the accumulated variance, with a sampling adequacy of 0.948. The expected dimensions were reproduced, and the added items formed a factor of their own. It is concluded that the adapted instrument is suitable for measuring teachers' perception of institutional management.

Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e EducaçãoVol. 12(10)
Universidade Santa Úrsula (BR), Universidade de Brasília (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), University Center of Brasília (BR), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Higher Education in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon