Coupling compliance and voluntary carbon markets: a system dynamics assessment in China

The strategic coupling of compliance and voluntary carbon markets is emerging as a pivotal path for achieving cost-effective decarbonization. However, existing literature seldom captures the dynamic feedback loops, cross-sectoral heterogeneities, and environmental economic benefits inherent in dual-market architectures. To fill this gap, this study develops a sector-specific system dynamics model to evaluate the integrated impacts of coupling China’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the China Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) scheme. Three distinct scenarios are modeled: no carbon trading market (BAU), Single Market (ETS-only), and Dual Market (ETS + CCER). Results indicate that the Dual Market scenario achieves emission reductions (40.3%) and energy savings (39.7%) comparable to the Single Market scenario, while the unit abatement cost advantage widens from CNY 0.02 to 0.41 per ton of CO2, and cumulative employment losses are reduced by around 0.19 million. Sectoral analysis reveals the power sector is the predominant buyer in the CCER market, accounting for 59.5% of the total transaction volume, while the cement sector acts primarily as a net seller of carbon allowances in 2030. Sensitivity analyses further confirm the robustness and advantages of coupling markets. Policy implications include gradually reducing the free allocation rate from 95% to 90%, dynamically adjusting the CCER offset rate within 5%-10% under strengthened oversight, and establishing coordinated price mechanisms. These findings provide robust evidence for optimizing dual-market architectures to advance both climate targets and a just, resilient low-carbon transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Footprints
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20517/cf.2026.113
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coupling compliance and voluntary carbon markets: a system dynamics assessment in China

Tong Zhu, Kaiwei Zhu, Zhi Guo, An Zeng
6 links
Carbon Footprints
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Coupling compliance and voluntary carbon markets: a system dynamics assessment in China

Tong Zhu, Kaiwei Zhu, Zhi Guo, An Zeng
article en

Abstract

The strategic coupling of compliance and voluntary carbon markets is emerging as a pivotal path for achieving cost-effective decarbonization. However, existing literature seldom captures the dynamic feedback loops, cross-sectoral heterogeneities, and environmental economic benefits inherent in dual-market architectures. To fill this gap, this study develops a sector-specific system dynamics model to evaluate the integrated impacts of coupling China’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the China Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) scheme. Three distinct scenarios are modeled: no carbon trading market (BAU), Single Market (ETS-only), and Dual Market (ETS + CCER). Results indicate that the Dual Market scenario achieves emission reductions (40.3%) and energy savings (39.7%) comparable to the Single Market scenario, while the unit abatement cost advantage widens from CNY 0.02 to 0.41 per ton of CO2, and cumulative employment losses are reduced by around 0.19 million. Sectoral analysis reveals the power sector is the predominant buyer in the CCER market, accounting for 59.5% of the total transaction volume, while the cement sector acts primarily as a net seller of carbon allowances in 2030. Sensitivity analyses further confirm the robustness and advantages of coupling markets. Policy implications include gradually reducing the free allocation rate from 95% to 90%, dynamically adjusting the CCER offset rate within 5%-10% under strengthened oversight, and establishing coordinated price mechanisms. These findings provide robust evidence for optimizing dual-market architectures to advance both climate targets and a just, resilient low-carbon transition.

Carbon FootprintsVol. 5(4)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institutes of Science and Development (CN)
Climate action, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon