Structure-Based Virtual Screening Identifies Sonidegib and Radotinib as Potential SPIN1 Inhibitors for Anticancer Drug Repurposing

Background: The methyllysine reader protein spindlin 1 (SPIN1) is implicated in various cancers by recognizing histone marks and modulating oncogenic pathways such as Wnt, PI3K/AKT, and RET. Despite increasing interest in SPIN1 as a therapeutic target, relatively few cell-active inhibitors have been characterized, and selectivity remains an important challenge. Therefore, developing novel SPIN1 inhibitors is needed, and drug repurposing offers a promising, time-efficient approach. Methods: This study used an integrated computational workflow to prioritize DrugBank compounds for potential interaction with SPIN1. A curated DrugBank library of 3500 compounds was screened against SPIN1 using structure-based molecular docking. Top hits were evaluated through PASS analysis to predict biological activity, followed by detailed interaction mapping, 500 ns molecular dynamics simulations, and essential dynamics to assess stability. Results: Sonidegib and Radotinib were prioritized based on docking, biological activity prediction, and interaction analyses. Comparative docking across SPIN2A, SPIN2B, SPIN3, and SPIN4 showed more favorable docking scores for SPIN1 for both prioritized compounds, whereas the reference molecule V88 showed a slightly more favorable score against SPIN2B; these differences do not establish isoform selectivity. The sampled trajectories showed that Sonidegib retained a broadly similar position in its initial binding pocket, whereas Radotinib shifted to a different binding region after 100 ns. MM-PBSA estimates showed overlapping uncertainties, and per-residue energy contributions differed between the compounds. Conclusions: These computational findings identify Sonidegib and Radotinib as candidates for experimental evaluation as potential SPIN1-binding compounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19111693
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure-Based Virtual Screening Identifies Sonidegib and Radotinib as Potential SPIN1 Inhibitors for Anticancer Drug Repurposing

Azna Zuberi, Omar Zuberi, Dinislam Khuzin, Majed Alokail et al.
4 links
Pharmaceuticals
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Structure-Based Virtual Screening Identifies Sonidegib and Radotinib as Potential SPIN1 Inhibitors for Anticancer Drug Repurposing

Azna Zuberi, Omar Zuberi, Dinislam Khuzin, Majed Alokail, Mohd Shahnawaz Khan
article en

Abstract

Background: The methyllysine reader protein spindlin 1 (SPIN1) is implicated in various cancers by recognizing histone marks and modulating oncogenic pathways such as Wnt, PI3K/AKT, and RET. Despite increasing interest in SPIN1 as a therapeutic target, relatively few cell-active inhibitors have been characterized, and selectivity remains an important challenge. Therefore, developing novel SPIN1 inhibitors is needed, and drug repurposing offers a promising, time-efficient approach. Methods: This study used an integrated computational workflow to prioritize DrugBank compounds for potential interaction with SPIN1. A curated DrugBank library of 3500 compounds was screened against SPIN1 using structure-based molecular docking. Top hits were evaluated through PASS analysis to predict biological activity, followed by detailed interaction mapping, 500 ns molecular dynamics simulations, and essential dynamics to assess stability. Results: Sonidegib and Radotinib were prioritized based on docking, biological activity prediction, and interaction analyses. Comparative docking across SPIN2A, SPIN2B, SPIN3, and SPIN4 showed more favorable docking scores for SPIN1 for both prioritized compounds, whereas the reference molecule V88 showed a slightly more favorable score against SPIN2B; these differences do not establish isoform selectivity. The sampled trajectories showed that Sonidegib retained a broadly similar position in its initial binding pocket, whereas Radotinib shifted to a different binding region after 100 ns. MM-PBSA estimates showed overlapping uncertainties, and per-residue energy contributions differed between the compounds. Conclusions: These computational findings identify Sonidegib and Radotinib as candidates for experimental evaluation as potential SPIN1-binding compounds.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 19(11)
Northwestern University (US), King Saud University (SA), Bashkir State Medical University (RU)
King Saud University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon