A Declaration on Power, Freedom, and the Public Nature of Intelligence in the Age of AI

As artificial intelligence (AI) evolves into a foundational infrastructure of future civilization, concerns surrounding AI governance extend beyond technological capability and existential risk. This declaration argues that the defining challenge of the AI era lies in the potential concentration of intelligence infrastructure and the resulting concentration of cognitive influence within a limited number of technological ecosystems. While vertically integrated AI systems may accelerate innovation, they may also create new forms of structural dependence that threaten individual and societal freedom. To address these emerging risks, the paper introduces three interrelated concepts: Technological Sovereignty, defined as freedom from dependence on a single technological ecosystem; Cognitive Sovereignty, understood as the ability to maintain meaningful control over one's own processes of thought and judgment; and Ontological Autonomy, the capacity to remain the author of one's own existence in an increasingly AI-mediated world. Building upon the framework of On-Site Adaptive Innovation (OAI), the declaration emphasizes the importance of decentralized adaptive capabilities and the democratization of intelligence infrastructure. It concludes that the future of AI will be shaped not only by the power of intelligent systems but also by the governance structures that determine access to and control of intelligence itself. Preserving technological plurality, cognitive freedom, and human autonomy is therefore presented as a fundamental prerequisite for maintaining freedom in the age of artificial intelligence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23722452
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Declaration on Power, Freedom, and the Public Nature of Intelligence in the Age of AI

Sungduck Lee
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Declaration on Power, Freedom, and the Public Nature of Intelligence in the Age of AI

Sungduck Lee
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) evolves into a foundational infrastructure of future civilization, concerns surrounding AI governance extend beyond technological capability and existential risk. This declaration argues that the defining challenge of the AI era lies in the potential concentration of intelligence infrastructure and the resulting concentration of cognitive influence within a limited number of technological ecosystems. While vertically integrated AI systems may accelerate innovation, they may also create new forms of structural dependence that threaten individual and societal freedom. To address these emerging risks, the paper introduces three interrelated concepts: Technological Sovereignty, defined as freedom from dependence on a single technological ecosystem; Cognitive Sovereignty, understood as the ability to maintain meaningful control over one's own processes of thought and judgment; and Ontological Autonomy, the capacity to remain the author of one's own existence in an increasingly AI-mediated world. Building upon the framework of On-Site Adaptive Innovation (OAI), the declaration emphasizes the importance of decentralized adaptive capabilities and the democratization of intelligence infrastructure. It concludes that the future of AI will be shaped not only by the power of intelligent systems but also by the governance structures that determine access to and control of intelligence itself. Preserving technological plurality, cognitive freedom, and human autonomy is therefore presented as a fundamental prerequisite for maintaining freedom in the age of artificial intelligence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon