Trusting Congress With Presidential Elections: Party Unity Amid Congressional Resolution of Presidential Election Crises

Amid alarm over presidential elections in the United States, a key concern has been the role of Congress in certifying presidential election results, which has been presumed to invite disaster. This article investigates the politics of congressional resolution of crises following close, competitive presidential elections. It argues that it is in legislators’ self-interest to prevent a crisis from reaching a breaking point: legislatures frequently do not survive coups or the outbreak of civil war. Offering a theoretical model supported by historical case studies from the United States, Chile, and Peru, this study shows that defeated presidential candidates find it effectively impossible to hold their parties together, even when partisan allies control legislative majorities. Legislators have strong political incentives to cooperate and to break partisan ranks to resolve a presidential election crisis decisively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Politics Research
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x261492696
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trusting Congress With Presidential Elections: Party Unity Amid Congressional Resolution of Presidential Election Crises

Daniel Larsen
American Politics Research
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Trusting Congress With Presidential Elections: Party Unity Amid Congressional Resolution of Presidential Election Crises

Daniel Larsen
article en

Abstract

Amid alarm over presidential elections in the United States, a key concern has been the role of Congress in certifying presidential election results, which has been presumed to invite disaster. This article investigates the politics of congressional resolution of crises following close, competitive presidential elections. It argues that it is in legislators’ self-interest to prevent a crisis from reaching a breaking point: legislatures frequently do not survive coups or the outbreak of civil war. Offering a theoretical model supported by historical case studies from the United States, Chile, and Peru, this study shows that defeated presidential candidates find it effectively impossible to hold their parties together, even when partisan allies control legislative majorities. Legislators have strong political incentives to cooperate and to break partisan ranks to resolve a presidential election crisis decisively.

American Politics Research
University of Cambridge (GB)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon