Effect of Finishing Technology on 316L Stainless Steel Internal Surfaces Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing technologies are continuously expanding their range of applications, with new use cases emerging across an increasingly broad spectrum of industries. From mechanical engineering to the medical sector, virtually all additive manufacturing applications require subsequent processing steps, whether in the form of material removal operations or surface finishing treatments. The present work aims to investigate the effects of various surface finishing technologies applied to different metal additive manufacturing processes, with particular emphasis on internal surfaces and on the influence of component geometry. A test artifact designed to satisfy multiple geometric criteria was manufactured using four manufacturing conditions derived from three metal additive manufacturing technologies (PBF-LB/M, MBJ, and MSD), which were subsequently combined with five distinct post-processing treatments. Finally, the effects associated with the different investigated factors are discussed, including the porosity of the as-built component, the initial surface roughness, the type of post-processing treatment (abrasive, chemical, electrochemical, or hybrid), and the variability induced by surface geometry. Surface roughness reductions exceeding 50% were achieved for most of the investigated process combinations. CP and AFM consistently produced the lowest roughness values, frequently achieving Ra values below 2 μm. While AFM exhibited a stronger sensitivity to channel diameter and local geometry, CP was not influenced by these variables as much. The results demonstrate that the effectiveness of internal surface finishing remains strongly dependent on the initial as-built roughness generated by the selected additive manufacturing technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metals
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/met16111194
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Finishing Technology on 316L Stainless Steel Internal Surfaces Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Enrico Bedogni, Paolo Veronesi, Simone Paggetti
2 links
Metals
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Effect of Finishing Technology on 316L Stainless Steel Internal Surfaces Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Enrico Bedogni, Paolo Veronesi, Simone Paggetti
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing technologies are continuously expanding their range of applications, with new use cases emerging across an increasingly broad spectrum of industries. From mechanical engineering to the medical sector, virtually all additive manufacturing applications require subsequent processing steps, whether in the form of material removal operations or surface finishing treatments. The present work aims to investigate the effects of various surface finishing technologies applied to different metal additive manufacturing processes, with particular emphasis on internal surfaces and on the influence of component geometry. A test artifact designed to satisfy multiple geometric criteria was manufactured using four manufacturing conditions derived from three metal additive manufacturing technologies (PBF-LB/M, MBJ, and MSD), which were subsequently combined with five distinct post-processing treatments. Finally, the effects associated with the different investigated factors are discussed, including the porosity of the as-built component, the initial surface roughness, the type of post-processing treatment (abrasive, chemical, electrochemical, or hybrid), and the variability induced by surface geometry. Surface roughness reductions exceeding 50% were achieved for most of the investigated process combinations. CP and AFM consistently produced the lowest roughness values, frequently achieving Ra values below 2 μm. While AFM exhibited a stronger sensitivity to channel diameter and local geometry, CP was not influenced by these variables as much. The results demonstrate that the effectiveness of internal surface finishing remains strongly dependent on the initial as-built roughness generated by the selected additive manufacturing technology.

MetalsVol. 16(11)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Krones (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Effect of Finishing Technology on 316L Stainless Steel Internal Surfaces Produced by Additive Manufacturing — Enrico Bedogni, Paolo Veronesi, et al. · Metals (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS