A review of published personalized phage therapy cases in clinical practice

The increase in antimicrobial resistant infections has fueled a resurgent interest in bacteriophage (phage) therapy. We conducted a literature review of personalized phage therapy cases in the peer-reviewed, English-language literature reported between 1/1/2005, to 8/31/2025 for which individual patient data were available, identifying and synthesizing data from a total of 323 patients described in 83 studies. Most patients (68%, 221/323) were treated with ≥ 2 phages (a phage cocktail). The median concentration of phages was 108 PFU/mL (IQR 107-109). Most patients (76%, 246/323) received antibiotics concurrent with phage therapy. The median duration of therapy was 10 days (IQR 5-21). The most common indications for phage therapy were skin/soft tissue, pulmonary, orthopedic, osteoarticular, and genitourinary infections. 144 patients received fixed (off-the-shelf) phage preparations whereas 179 received bespoke phage preparations (i.e., personalized therapy). For cases where outcomes data were available, 78% (253/323), experienced clinical improvement while the targeted pathogen was eradicated in 61% (177/290) of cases. Nine patients had treatment withdrawn due to tolerability concerns. These data indicate that there is substantial heterogeneity in current personalized phage therapy clinical practices but that this approach can be successful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCI Insight
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.209406
Primary Topic
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of published personalized phage therapy cases in clinical practice

Grace D. Cullen, Gina Ann Suh, Krystyna Dąbrowska, Daisuke Furukawa et al.
1 links
JCI Insight
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
article

A review of published personalized phage therapy cases in clinical practice

Grace D. Cullen, Gina Ann Suh, Krystyna Dąbrowska, Daisuke Furukawa, Paul L. Bollyky, Tiffany Luong, Robert W. Targ, Patrick M. Blankenberg, Aarav Singh
article en

Abstract

The increase in antimicrobial resistant infections has fueled a resurgent interest in bacteriophage (phage) therapy. We conducted a literature review of personalized phage therapy cases in the peer-reviewed, English-language literature reported between 1/1/2005, to 8/31/2025 for which individual patient data were available, identifying and synthesizing data from a total of 323 patients described in 83 studies. Most patients (68%, 221/323) were treated with ≥ 2 phages (a phage cocktail). The median concentration of phages was 108 PFU/mL (IQR 107-109). Most patients (76%, 246/323) received antibiotics concurrent with phage therapy. The median duration of therapy was 10 days (IQR 5-21). The most common indications for phage therapy were skin/soft tissue, pulmonary, orthopedic, osteoarticular, and genitourinary infections. 144 patients received fixed (off-the-shelf) phage preparations whereas 179 received bespoke phage preparations (i.e., personalized therapy). For cases where outcomes data were available, 78% (253/323), experienced clinical improvement while the targeted pathogen was eradicated in 61% (177/290) of cases. Nine patients had treatment withdrawn due to tolerability concerns. These data indicate that there is substantial heterogeneity in current personalized phage therapy clinical practices but that this approach can be successful.

JCI Insight
Mayo Clinic (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy (PL), Stanford University (US), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon