Don’t say it’s green! How green framing can depress support for renewable energy

Abstract The green transition implies a shift towards renewable energies. However, their deployment has faced some backlash. This article assesses whether (a) the type of renewables and (b) framing can affect support for deployment. Through a survey experiment, three types of renewables (hydropower, onshore wind, offshore wind) and three types of frames (energy sovereignty, economic competitiveness, green transition) are evaluated, in general and for two typically skeptical groups (the least climate-worried and the less-educated ruralites). Using the case of Norway, we find strong effects for the type of renewables but little evidence for general framing effects. There are two exceptions: green framing has a negative effect on support for renewables where citizens have more fluid preferences (offshore wind) and depresses support among the least climate-worried and the less-educated ruralites. For these citizens, remaining silent about the climate benefits of renewable energy will actually boost support for its deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Policy
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x2610138x
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Don’t say it’s green! How green framing can depress support for renewable energy

Michael R. Tatham, Marte S. Skogen
Journal of Public Policy
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
article

Don’t say it’s green! How green framing can depress support for renewable energy

Michael R. Tatham, Marte S. Skogen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The green transition implies a shift towards renewable energies. However, their deployment has faced some backlash. This article assesses whether (a) the type of renewables and (b) framing can affect support for deployment. Through a survey experiment, three types of renewables (hydropower, onshore wind, offshore wind) and three types of frames (energy sovereignty, economic competitiveness, green transition) are evaluated, in general and for two typically skeptical groups (the least climate-worried and the less-educated ruralites). Using the case of Norway, we find strong effects for the type of renewables but little evidence for general framing effects. There are two exceptions: green framing has a negative effect on support for renewables where citizens have more fluid preferences (offshore wind) and depresses support among the least climate-worried and the less-educated ruralites. For these citizens, remaining silent about the climate benefits of renewable energy will actually boost support for its deployment.

Journal of Public Policy
University of Bergen (NO)
Affordable and clean energy, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon