Differences in men’s and women’s responses to large-size versus idealized advertising models

This article examines the effect of sex-matched large-size (vs. idealized) models on men’s and women’s ad and brand attitude, and the mediating role of positive and negative emotions in this relationship. This article extends research on the relationship between large-size models and advertising effectiveness by clarifying (1) men’s and women’s differential responses to advertisements featuring large-size relative to sex-matched idealized (muscular or thin) models, and (2) positive and negative emotions as distinct psychological mechanisms in this relationship. Results show that men’s and women’s responses to large-size models diverge: Women report more favorable ad and brand attitudes in response to a large-size (vs. idealized thin) model and positive emotions mediate this effect. Men express less favorable ad and brand attitudes in response to a large-size (vs. idealized muscular) model and negative emotions mediate this effect. These findings challenge the assumption that advertisements featuring large-size models resonate with all consumers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advertising
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2026.2751347
Primary Topic
Media, Gender, and Advertising
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in men’s and women’s responses to large-size versus idealized advertising models

Bianca Grohmann, Xiu Wu
International Journal of Advertising
Media, Gender, and Advertising
article

Differences in men’s and women’s responses to large-size versus idealized advertising models

Bianca Grohmann, Xiu Wu
article en

Abstract

This article examines the effect of sex-matched large-size (vs. idealized) models on men’s and women’s ad and brand attitude, and the mediating role of positive and negative emotions in this relationship. This article extends research on the relationship between large-size models and advertising effectiveness by clarifying (1) men’s and women’s differential responses to advertisements featuring large-size relative to sex-matched idealized (muscular or thin) models, and (2) positive and negative emotions as distinct psychological mechanisms in this relationship. Results show that men’s and women’s responses to large-size models diverge: Women report more favorable ad and brand attitudes in response to a large-size (vs. idealized thin) model and positive emotions mediate this effect. Men express less favorable ad and brand attitudes in response to a large-size (vs. idealized muscular) model and negative emotions mediate this effect. These findings challenge the assumption that advertisements featuring large-size models resonate with all consumers.

International Journal of Advertising
Université Laval (CA), Concordia University (CA)
Concordia University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Media, Gender, and Advertising
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Differences in men’s and women’s responses to large-size versus idealized advertising models — Bianca Grohmann, Xiu Wu · International Journal of Advertising (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS