Sex- and gender-related aspects of patient safety in radiation oncology: a scoping review

Background Radiation oncology is a safety-critical clinical discipline in which sex-related biological attributes and gender-related social processes may influence treatment planning, treatment effects, symptoms, care use, and follow-up. Their relevance to patient safety across the radiation-oncology pathway remains incompletely characterized. We examined evidence for sex- or gender-related aspects affecting safety in radiation oncology. Methods We conducted a scoping review of original studies identified through a PubMed search conducted on 22 July 2026 and through backward reference-list searching. Data were charted at the level of individual findings, classified according to the operationalization of sex and gender, and mapped to four published patient-safety categories and 27 subcategories. Synthesis was descriptive; no meta-analysis, formal critical appraisal, or certainty assessment was undertaken. Results The PubMed search yielded 159 records. Thirty-two database-identified studies and five citation-derived original studies met the eligibility criteria. The 37 included studies contributed 49 reportable empirical findings: 33 differences or associations, 10 mixed findings, and six statistically non-significant findings. Forty-four findings were clinical or technical outcome signals with potential safety relevance and five directly concerned care processes. Evidence mapped to six patient-specific subcategories. Twenty studies were classified as analyses of sex and 17 as unclear; no study operationalized multidimensional gender. Conclusions The targeted search, including five citation-derived studies, may selectively capture studies reporting sex only as a covariate. The retrieved evidence indicates that sex can be relevant to the safe design and delivery of radiotherapy, but the evidence is fragmented, predominantly observational, and largely limited to clinical outcome associations. Prospective studies should test whether clearly defined sex- and gender-informed care processes improve safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1962214
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex- and gender-related aspects of patient safety in radiation oncology: a scoping review

Andrea Baehr, Maximilian Grohmann, Angela Besserer, Maike Trommer
Frontiers in Oncology
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Sex- and gender-related aspects of patient safety in radiation oncology: a scoping review

Andrea Baehr, Maximilian Grohmann, Angela Besserer, Maike Trommer
article en

Abstract

Background Radiation oncology is a safety-critical clinical discipline in which sex-related biological attributes and gender-related social processes may influence treatment planning, treatment effects, symptoms, care use, and follow-up. Their relevance to patient safety across the radiation-oncology pathway remains incompletely characterized. We examined evidence for sex- or gender-related aspects affecting safety in radiation oncology. Methods We conducted a scoping review of original studies identified through a PubMed search conducted on 22 July 2026 and through backward reference-list searching. Data were charted at the level of individual findings, classified according to the operationalization of sex and gender, and mapped to four published patient-safety categories and 27 subcategories. Synthesis was descriptive; no meta-analysis, formal critical appraisal, or certainty assessment was undertaken. Results The PubMed search yielded 159 records. Thirty-two database-identified studies and five citation-derived original studies met the eligibility criteria. The 37 included studies contributed 49 reportable empirical findings: 33 differences or associations, 10 mixed findings, and six statistically non-significant findings. Forty-four findings were clinical or technical outcome signals with potential safety relevance and five directly concerned care processes. Evidence mapped to six patient-specific subcategories. Twenty studies were classified as analyses of sex and 17 as unclear; no study operationalized multidimensional gender. Conclusions The targeted search, including five citation-derived studies, may selectively capture studies reporting sex only as a covariate. The retrieved evidence indicates that sex can be relevant to the safe design and delivery of radiotherapy, but the evidence is fragmented, predominantly observational, and largely limited to clinical outcome associations. Prospective studies should test whether clearly defined sex- and gender-informed care processes improve safety.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
University Hospital Bonn (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Universität Leipzig
Good health and well-being, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon