Impact of multidisciplinary rounds for enhancing communication and decision making in the medical intensive care unit care for cardiac patients: A prospective interventional study

Objectives Effective communication and collaborative decision-making are critical in the management of critically ill cardiac patients in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). Evidence suggests that poor communication among healthcare teams can contribute to errors and suboptimal patient care outcomes. Fragmented communication among healthcare teams can result in delays in treatment, medical errors, and suboptimal patient outcomes. Structured multidisciplinary rounds (MDRs) have been identified as a promising approach to improving these aspects by fostering coordination and collaborative care. Evidence from previous studies highlights their benefits, such as reducing medical errors and enhancing patient safety. These findings are supported by guidelines that emphasize the importance of structured communication in critical care environments. This study aims to implement and evaluate the impact of structured MDRs on communication, decision making, and clinical outcomes in MICU patients with cardiac conditions at Dr. Moopens Medical College Hospital, Wayanad, India. Material and Methods A prospective interventional study was conducted over six months to compare outcomes before and after the implementation of structured MDRs. Metrics such as communication efficiency, team satisfaction, and clinical outcomes, including ICU length of stay and readmission rates, were analyzed. Results The introduction of structured MDRs significantly enhanced communication scores (4.1. vs. 3.2 on a 5-point Likert scale, p<0.01), reduced ICU length of stay (7.8 vs. 9.5 days, p=0.02), and decreased 30-day readmission rates (12% vs. 18%, p=0.03). Furthermore, healthcare team satisfaction scores improved significantly (4.4 vs. 3.5, p<0.01). Conclusion Structured MDRs were effective in improving communication, facilitating collaborative decision-making, and optimizing clinical outcomes. This approach is recommended for broader adoption in ICUs to enhance care for critically ill cardiac patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/anams_58_2025
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of multidisciplinary rounds for enhancing communication and decision making in the medical intensive care unit care for cardiac patients: A prospective interventional study

Christopher G. Mathew, Jitha Devan, Arathy Chandran A R
1 links
Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India)
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Impact of multidisciplinary rounds for enhancing communication and decision making in the medical intensive care unit care for cardiac patients: A prospective interventional study

Christopher G. Mathew, Jitha Devan, Arathy Chandran A R
article en

Abstract

Objectives Effective communication and collaborative decision-making are critical in the management of critically ill cardiac patients in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). Evidence suggests that poor communication among healthcare teams can contribute to errors and suboptimal patient care outcomes. Fragmented communication among healthcare teams can result in delays in treatment, medical errors, and suboptimal patient outcomes. Structured multidisciplinary rounds (MDRs) have been identified as a promising approach to improving these aspects by fostering coordination and collaborative care. Evidence from previous studies highlights their benefits, such as reducing medical errors and enhancing patient safety. These findings are supported by guidelines that emphasize the importance of structured communication in critical care environments. This study aims to implement and evaluate the impact of structured MDRs on communication, decision making, and clinical outcomes in MICU patients with cardiac conditions at Dr. Moopens Medical College Hospital, Wayanad, India. Material and Methods A prospective interventional study was conducted over six months to compare outcomes before and after the implementation of structured MDRs. Metrics such as communication efficiency, team satisfaction, and clinical outcomes, including ICU length of stay and readmission rates, were analyzed. Results The introduction of structured MDRs significantly enhanced communication scores (4.1. vs. 3.2 on a 5-point Likert scale, p<0.01), reduced ICU length of stay (7.8 vs. 9.5 days, p=0.02), and decreased 30-day readmission rates (12% vs. 18%, p=0.03). Furthermore, healthcare team satisfaction scores improved significantly (4.4 vs. 3.5, p<0.01). Conclusion Structured MDRs were effective in improving communication, facilitating collaborative decision-making, and optimizing clinical outcomes. This approach is recommended for broader adoption in ICUs to enhance care for critically ill cardiac patients.

Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India)Vol. 0
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon