Convergence Rate Analysis of Non-I.I.D. SplitFed Learning with Partial Worker Participation and Auxiliary Networks

In conventional Federated Learning (FL), clients work together to train a model managed by a central server, intending to speed up the learning process. However, this approach imposes significant computational and communication burdens on clients, particularly with complex models. Additionally, while FL strives to protect client privacy, the server’s access to local and global models raises security concerns. To address these challenges, Split Learning (SL) separates the model into parts handled by the client and the server, though it suffers from inefficiencies due to sequential client participation. To overcome these issues, SplitFed Learning (SFL) was proposed, which combines the parallelism of FL with the model-splitting strategy of SL, enabling simultaneous training by multiple clients. Our main contribution is the theoretical analysis of SFL, which, for the first time, includes non-i.i.d. datasets, non-convex loss functions, and both full and partial client participation. We provide convergence proofs for a state-of-the-art SFL algorithm based on conventional convergence analysis assumptions for FL. Our results prove that we can recover the \( O(1/\sqrt{T}) \) convergence rate of conventional FL for the SFL algorithm with the distinction that increasing the number of local steps or clients may not speed up the convergence in SFL. Experiments on Fashion-MNIST confirm that a longer server update period slows down the server-side model, and they show that more clients still reduce the gradient norms, which suggests that the bounds are conservative in the number of clients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0335.v2
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Convergence Rate Analysis of Non-I.I.D. SplitFed Learning with Partial Worker Participation and Auxiliary Networks

Amirreza Talebi
Preprints.org
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
preprint

Convergence Rate Analysis of Non-I.I.D. SplitFed Learning with Partial Worker Participation and Auxiliary Networks

Amirreza Talebi
preprint en

Abstract

In conventional Federated Learning (FL), clients work together to train a model managed by a central server, intending to speed up the learning process. However, this approach imposes significant computational and communication burdens on clients, particularly with complex models. Additionally, while FL strives to protect client privacy, the server’s access to local and global models raises security concerns. To address these challenges, Split Learning (SL) separates the model into parts handled by the client and the server, though it suffers from inefficiencies due to sequential client participation. To overcome these issues, SplitFed Learning (SFL) was proposed, which combines the parallelism of FL with the model-splitting strategy of SL, enabling simultaneous training by multiple clients. Our main contribution is the theoretical analysis of SFL, which, for the first time, includes non-i.i.d. datasets, non-convex loss functions, and both full and partial client participation. We provide convergence proofs for a state-of-the-art SFL algorithm based on conventional convergence analysis assumptions for FL. Our results prove that we can recover the \( O(1/\sqrt{T}) \) convergence rate of conventional FL for the SFL algorithm with the distinction that increasing the number of local steps or clients may not speed up the convergence in SFL. Experiments on Fashion-MNIST confirm that a longer server update period slows down the server-side model, and they show that more clients still reduce the gradient norms, which suggests that the bounds are conservative in the number of clients.

Preprints.org
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon