Wheel-Flat Identification from Axle-Box Acceleration: Cross-Track Generalisation and In-Service Validation

The objective of this study is to assess cross-track generalisation and direct controlled-to-service transfer of wheel-flat classifiers based on three revolution-wise axle-box acceleration indicators: Root Mean Square (RMS), Crest Factor (CF), and Wheel-Flat Index (WFI). Full-scale controlled measurements were analysed across distinct track sections, and cross-track transferability was assessed through nested leave-one-track-out validation of speed-dependent k-nearest neighbour classifiers. Final all-track models were applied without retraining or field-specific adaptation to 403 acquisitions collected during commercial freight operation with a wireless axle-box sensor. The controlled measurements showed that the dynamic manifestation of a fixed wheel-flat is not spatially invariant, while the combined RMS–CF–WFI representation retained useful discrimination across track sections. Cross-track balanced accuracy ranged from 0.841 to 0.980; all-track models achieved mean balanced accuracies of 0.967, 0.937, and 0.931 at 30, 45, and 60 km/h. In service, balanced accuracy was 0.878, specificity 0.984, and binary-decision coverage 0.978 against a manually reviewed signal-based reference. Applicability analysis of the exploratory high-speed extension indicated that speed extrapolation does not necessarily imply feature-space extrapolation, although false-positive acquisitions showed substantial departures from the controlled support. These results support compact, transferable axle-box diagnostics for in-service wheel-flat monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app162110628
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wheel-Flat Identification from Axle-Box Acceleration: Cross-Track Generalisation and In-Service Validation

Angelo Cavallo, Gisella Marita Tomasini, Francesco Castelli Dezza
3 links
Applied Sciences
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
article

Wheel-Flat Identification from Axle-Box Acceleration: Cross-Track Generalisation and In-Service Validation

Angelo Cavallo, Gisella Marita Tomasini, Francesco Castelli Dezza
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess cross-track generalisation and direct controlled-to-service transfer of wheel-flat classifiers based on three revolution-wise axle-box acceleration indicators: Root Mean Square (RMS), Crest Factor (CF), and Wheel-Flat Index (WFI). Full-scale controlled measurements were analysed across distinct track sections, and cross-track transferability was assessed through nested leave-one-track-out validation of speed-dependent k-nearest neighbour classifiers. Final all-track models were applied without retraining or field-specific adaptation to 403 acquisitions collected during commercial freight operation with a wireless axle-box sensor. The controlled measurements showed that the dynamic manifestation of a fixed wheel-flat is not spatially invariant, while the combined RMS–CF–WFI representation retained useful discrimination across track sections. Cross-track balanced accuracy ranged from 0.841 to 0.980; all-track models achieved mean balanced accuracies of 0.967, 0.937, and 0.931 at 30, 45, and 60 km/h. In service, balanced accuracy was 0.878, specificity 0.984, and binary-decision coverage 0.978 against a manually reviewed signal-based reference. Applicability analysis of the exploratory high-speed extension indicated that speed extrapolation does not necessarily imply feature-space extrapolation, although false-positive acquisitions showed substantial departures from the controlled support. These results support compact, transferable axle-box diagnostics for in-service wheel-flat monitoring.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(21)
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon