Changes in Perceptions of Trust in Human-AI Interactions

This study examined how educational briefings about Artificial Intelligence (AI) hallucinations influence user trust, caution, and willingness to continue using AI systems. We recruited 51 participants through the online platform Prolific for an online questionnaire evaluating AI use and task-focused AI scenarios. After questions about trust and AI, participants read about common inaccuracies in Large Language Models. Participants showed a significant decrease in self-reported trust, indicating increased awareness of AI limitations. Contrary to expectations, perceptions of AI reliability and competence did not predict willingness to reuse AI in academic scenarios. Affective trust played a stronger role than cognitive trust, with perceived emotional support significantly predicting forgiveness of AI errors. Increased caution also predicted greater recalibration of trust, although willingness to continue using AI remained high. These findings suggest that educational interventions can promote calibrated trust in AI without discouraging continued use, highlighting the importance of transparency and context-sensitive design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261498742
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in Perceptions of Trust in Human-AI Interactions

Spencer C. Castro, Zoe Loh, Abhinav Hemmady
6 links
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Changes in Perceptions of Trust in Human-AI Interactions

Spencer C. Castro, Zoe Loh, Abhinav Hemmady
article en

Abstract

This study examined how educational briefings about Artificial Intelligence (AI) hallucinations influence user trust, caution, and willingness to continue using AI systems. We recruited 51 participants through the online platform Prolific for an online questionnaire evaluating AI use and task-focused AI scenarios. After questions about trust and AI, participants read about common inaccuracies in Large Language Models. Participants showed a significant decrease in self-reported trust, indicating increased awareness of AI limitations. Contrary to expectations, perceptions of AI reliability and competence did not predict willingness to reuse AI in academic scenarios. Affective trust played a stronger role than cognitive trust, with perceived emotional support significantly predicting forgiveness of AI errors. Increased caution also predicted greater recalibration of trust, although willingness to continue using AI remained high. These findings suggest that educational interventions can promote calibrated trust in AI without discouraging continued use, highlighting the importance of transparency and context-sensitive design.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
University of California, Merced (US)
University of California Merced
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Changes in Perceptions of Trust in Human-AI Interactions — Spencer C. Castro, Zoe Loh, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS