Comparative plaque- and liquid-based phage susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in a cystic fibrosis randomized clinical trial

ABSTRACT The optimal phage susceptibility testing (PST) method is unclear. Here, two PST methods were compared using Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis enrolled in a placebo-controlled clinical trial of a single intravenous dose of a four-phage cocktail (WRAIR-PAM-CF1). In total, 508 P. aeruginosa sputum isolates were evaluated, including isolates collected before or after phage or placebo treatment, isolates from the same trial participants over time, and isolates of different colony morphologies from the same participants at the same time point. Susceptibility to phages PaWRA01Φ11, PaWRA01Φ39, PaWRA02Φ83, and PaWRA02Φ87 and a cocktail of all four phages was assessed using a plaque assay (PA) and a Biolog Omnilog-based liquid assay (LA) with the same bacterial inoculum. A total of 170/508 isolates (33%) and 195/508 isolates (38%) were identified as susceptible to the cocktail by PA and LA, respectively. Among the susceptible isolates, 169/170 (99%; PA) and 187/195 (96%; LA) also tested susceptible to at least one of the four phages in the cocktail. Susceptible percent agreement between the PA and LA ranged from 76% to 100% and non-susceptible percent agreement ranged from 89% to 100% for all phages studied and the cocktail. Phage PaWRA02Φ83 demonstrated the greatest individual activity, with 164/508 (32%) and 188/508 (37%) isolates testing susceptible by PA and LA, respectively. The four-phage cocktail provided numerically broader coverage of P. aeruginosa (i.e., had the highest susceptibility rate) than did any single phage. There was high concordance between PST results by PA and LA. IMPORTANCE Standardization of phage susceptibility testing (PST) methods is essential to support phage therapy trials and any future clinical implementation. There are no standardized PST methods or interpretive criteria for PST. In this study, PST was performed by a plaque assay and a Biolog Omnilog-based liquid assay on Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from cystic fibrosis patients enrolled in a clinical trial. Susceptibility of 508 isolates to four phages and a cocktail of all four was evaluated. There was high concordance between susceptibility assessed by plaque and liquid assays and numerically broader coverage of P. aeruginosa by the cocktail compared to any single phage. This manuscript should be of interest to those performing PST.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00875-26
Primary Topic
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative plaque- and liquid-based phage susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in a cystic fibrosis randomized clinical trial

Robert Turner Schooley, Pranita D. Tamma, Henry F. “Chip” Chambers, Kerryl E. Greenwood‐Quaintance et al.
4 links
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
article

Comparative plaque- and liquid-based phage susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in a cystic fibrosis randomized clinical trial

Robert Turner Schooley, Pranita D. Tamma, Henry F. “Chip” Chambers, Kerryl E. Greenwood‐Quaintance, Vance G. Fowler, Maria Souli, Mikeljon P. Nikolich, Robin Patel, David T. Pride, Andrey A. Filippov, Krupa Mukesh Parmar, Daria Van Tyne, Scott R. Evans, Christina A. Koscianski, Wanying Shao, Lauren Komarow, on behalf of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The optimal phage susceptibility testing (PST) method is unclear. Here, two PST methods were compared using Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis enrolled in a placebo-controlled clinical trial of a single intravenous dose of a four-phage cocktail (WRAIR-PAM-CF1). In total, 508 P. aeruginosa sputum isolates were evaluated, including isolates collected before or after phage or placebo treatment, isolates from the same trial participants over time, and isolates of different colony morphologies from the same participants at the same time point. Susceptibility to phages PaWRA01Φ11, PaWRA01Φ39, PaWRA02Φ83, and PaWRA02Φ87 and a cocktail of all four phages was assessed using a plaque assay (PA) and a Biolog Omnilog-based liquid assay (LA) with the same bacterial inoculum. A total of 170/508 isolates (33%) and 195/508 isolates (38%) were identified as susceptible to the cocktail by PA and LA, respectively. Among the susceptible isolates, 169/170 (99%; PA) and 187/195 (96%; LA) also tested susceptible to at least one of the four phages in the cocktail. Susceptible percent agreement between the PA and LA ranged from 76% to 100% and non-susceptible percent agreement ranged from 89% to 100% for all phages studied and the cocktail. Phage PaWRA02Φ83 demonstrated the greatest individual activity, with 164/508 (32%) and 188/508 (37%) isolates testing susceptible by PA and LA, respectively. The four-phage cocktail provided numerically broader coverage of P. aeruginosa (i.e., had the highest susceptibility rate) than did any single phage. There was high concordance between PST results by PA and LA. IMPORTANCE Standardization of phage susceptibility testing (PST) methods is essential to support phage therapy trials and any future clinical implementation. There are no standardized PST methods or interpretive criteria for PST. In this study, PST was performed by a plaque assay and a Biolog Omnilog-based liquid assay on Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from cystic fibrosis patients enrolled in a clinical trial. Susceptibility of 508 isolates to four phages and a cocktail of all four was evaluated. There was high concordance between susceptibility assessed by plaque and liquid assays and numerically broader coverage of P. aeruginosa by the cocktail compared to any single phage. This manuscript should be of interest to those performing PST.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
San Francisco General Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), George Washington University (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), University of California System (US), University of California San Diego (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Duke Clinical Research Institute (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon