Does Looking at the Placenta Improve First-Trimester Screening? Placental Volume, Vascular Indices and Fetal Growth Disorders in an Unselected Cohort

Background/Objectives: Fetal growth disorders and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy share pathophysiological pathways rooted in impaired first-trimester placentation. We asked whether three-dimensional placental volume and the VOCAL vascular indices add prognostic information to first-trimester screening and how repeatable and setting-dependent they are. Methods: A prospective cohort of 445 singleton pregnancies was scanned at 11+0–13+6 weeks, twice each at two pulse repetition frequencies (2.3 and 0.9 kHz). Markers were converted to crown–rump-length-adjusted z-scores. The primary analysis tested the incremental value of volume over clinical risk factors plus PAPP-A for a composite of hypertensive disorders, fetal growth restriction or small-for-gestational-age birth, with bootstrap optimism correction (1000 resamples). Results: The composite outcome occurred in 69/407 women (17.0%). Volume was repeatable (intraclass correlation 0.90) and not measurably associated with maternal adiposity, whereas the indices differed threefold between paired acquisitions obtained at different settings, varied between operators and fell with body mass index. Volume was associated with the outcome independently of clinical risk factors and PAPP-A (likelihood-ratio p < 0.001; odds ratio 0.55 per SD, 95% CI 0.41–0.74) and of the combined preeclampsia-screening components; the corresponding increase in the area under the curve was small (optimism-corrected 0.59 to 0.66) and not significant by DeLong’s test (p = 0.13), and calibration slopes indicated overfitting. The indices showed no consistent incremental value. Small placentas preceded growth restriction (composite outcome 45% below the study-derived 5th centile), and large placentas preceded large-for-gestational-age birth. With four cases of preeclampsia, the study is uninformative for preeclampsia-specific prediction. Conclusions: First-trimester placental volume is a reproducible marker, not measurably associated with maternal adiposity, which was independently associated with fetal growth disorders in this cohort; the resulting gain in discrimination was small and its clinical value is unproven. Aspirin use after screening was not recorded. External validation, assessment of reproducibility between operators and analysts, and evaluation of clinical utility are required before any use in practice. The vascular indices are acquisition- and habitus-dependent and showed no consistent incremental prognostic value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13111475
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Looking at the Placenta Improve First-Trimester Screening? Placental Volume, Vascular Indices and Fetal Growth Disorders in an Unselected Cohort

Luis Vázquez-Fonseca, V. Melero Jimenez, Rocío Quintero‐Prado, Miguel Ángel López-Guerrero et al.
Children
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Does Looking at the Placenta Improve First-Trimester Screening? Placental Volume, Vascular Indices and Fetal Growth Disorders in an Unselected Cohort

Luis Vázquez-Fonseca, V. Melero Jimenez, Rocío Quintero‐Prado, Miguel Ángel López-Guerrero, Francisco Visiedo, Fernando Bugatto, Elena Díaz-Fernández, María Mercedes Calero-Ruiz
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Fetal growth disorders and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy share pathophysiological pathways rooted in impaired first-trimester placentation. We asked whether three-dimensional placental volume and the VOCAL vascular indices add prognostic information to first-trimester screening and how repeatable and setting-dependent they are. Methods: A prospective cohort of 445 singleton pregnancies was scanned at 11+0–13+6 weeks, twice each at two pulse repetition frequencies (2.3 and 0.9 kHz). Markers were converted to crown–rump-length-adjusted z-scores. The primary analysis tested the incremental value of volume over clinical risk factors plus PAPP-A for a composite of hypertensive disorders, fetal growth restriction or small-for-gestational-age birth, with bootstrap optimism correction (1000 resamples). Results: The composite outcome occurred in 69/407 women (17.0%). Volume was repeatable (intraclass correlation 0.90) and not measurably associated with maternal adiposity, whereas the indices differed threefold between paired acquisitions obtained at different settings, varied between operators and fell with body mass index. Volume was associated with the outcome independently of clinical risk factors and PAPP-A (likelihood-ratio p < 0.001; odds ratio 0.55 per SD, 95% CI 0.41–0.74) and of the combined preeclampsia-screening components; the corresponding increase in the area under the curve was small (optimism-corrected 0.59 to 0.66) and not significant by DeLong’s test (p = 0.13), and calibration slopes indicated overfitting. The indices showed no consistent incremental value. Small placentas preceded growth restriction (composite outcome 45% below the study-derived 5th centile), and large placentas preceded large-for-gestational-age birth. With four cases of preeclampsia, the study is uninformative for preeclampsia-specific prediction. Conclusions: First-trimester placental volume is a reproducible marker, not measurably associated with maternal adiposity, which was independently associated with fetal growth disorders in this cohort; the resulting gain in discrimination was small and its clinical value is unproven. Aspirin use after screening was not recorded. External validation, assessment of reproducibility between operators and analysts, and evaluation of clinical utility are required before any use in practice. The vascular indices are acquisition- and habitus-dependent and showed no consistent incremental prognostic value.

ChildrenVol. 13(11)
Universidad de Cádiz (ES), Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cadiz (ES), Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar (ES)
Consejería de Transformación Económica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades, Junta de Andalucía
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon