Correlates of Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Adults With and Without Comorbid Heart Failure

INTRODUCTION: Attaining good glycemic control (GC) in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is critical, yet the presence of comorbidities like heart failure (HF) presents overwhelming self-care complexities. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the demographic, psychosocial, and clinical factors associated with glycemic control among T2D adults with and without comorbid HF. DESIGN: A comparative cross-sectional study. METHODS: A total of 210 adult T2D patients (105 with comorbid HF, 105 without comorbid HF) in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Referral Hospital (TASRH), the largest tertiary healthcare setting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, were enrolled. Data gathered included demographic traits, clinical parameters including the outcome variable HbA1c (categorized as "good glycemic control" for HbA1c < 7% and "poor glycemic control" for HbA1c ≥ 7%), and standardized psychosocial scales (SDSCA, PDSMS, DKT2, PHQ-9, and ESSI). Bivariate analysis (Chi-square and biserial correlation) and Enter method logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULT: Across both groups, good GC (HbA1c < 7%) was alarmingly low, only 10.43% in the non-HF and 9.52% in the HF comorbid group (p = 0.818). In the non-HF group, the multivariate model revealed that only a higher social support (ESSI) score significantly predicted a higher likelihood of good GC (AOR = 1.518, 95% CI: 1.002, 2.302, p = 0.049). Conversely, for those with comorbid HF, a higher diabetes self-efficacy (PDSMS) score (AOR = 1.569, 95% CI: 1.045, 2.355, p = 0.030) and taking a higher number of daily medications (AOR = 2.502, 95% CI: 1.050, 5.962, p = 0.038) significantly predicted good GC. CONCLUSION: This study highlights a critical gap in glycemic control regardless of HF status. However, the actionable drivers of glycemic success diverge fundamentally: social support systems are vital for GC success in uncomplicated T2D, whereas promoting self-efficacy and total count of daily medications dictates success in the face of complex HF comorbidity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.70140
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlates of Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Adults With and Without Comorbid Heart Failure

Senbeta Guteta Abdissa, Fekadu Aga, REBECCA A. GARY, Melinda Kay Higgins et al.
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Correlates of Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Adults With and Without Comorbid Heart Failure

Senbeta Guteta Abdissa, Fekadu Aga, REBECCA A. GARY, Melinda Kay Higgins, Sandra Barker Dunbar, Tedla Kebede
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Attaining good glycemic control (GC) in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is critical, yet the presence of comorbidities like heart failure (HF) presents overwhelming self-care complexities. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the demographic, psychosocial, and clinical factors associated with glycemic control among T2D adults with and without comorbid HF. DESIGN: A comparative cross-sectional study. METHODS: A total of 210 adult T2D patients (105 with comorbid HF, 105 without comorbid HF) in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Referral Hospital (TASRH), the largest tertiary healthcare setting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, were enrolled. Data gathered included demographic traits, clinical parameters including the outcome variable HbA1c (categorized as "good glycemic control" for HbA1c < 7% and "poor glycemic control" for HbA1c ≥ 7%), and standardized psychosocial scales (SDSCA, PDSMS, DKT2, PHQ-9, and ESSI). Bivariate analysis (Chi-square and biserial correlation) and Enter method logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULT: Across both groups, good GC (HbA1c < 7%) was alarmingly low, only 10.43% in the non-HF and 9.52% in the HF comorbid group (p = 0.818). In the non-HF group, the multivariate model revealed that only a higher social support (ESSI) score significantly predicted a higher likelihood of good GC (AOR = 1.518, 95% CI: 1.002, 2.302, p = 0.049). Conversely, for those with comorbid HF, a higher diabetes self-efficacy (PDSMS) score (AOR = 1.569, 95% CI: 1.045, 2.355, p = 0.030) and taking a higher number of daily medications (AOR = 2.502, 95% CI: 1.050, 5.962, p = 0.038) significantly predicted good GC. CONCLUSION: This study highlights a critical gap in glycemic control regardless of HF status. However, the actionable drivers of glycemic success diverge fundamentally: social support systems are vital for GC success in uncomplicated T2D, whereas promoting self-efficacy and total count of daily medications dictates success in the face of complex HF comorbidity.

Journal of Nursing ScholarshipVol. 58(6)
Emory University (US), Woodruff Health Sciences Center (US), Addis Ababa University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon