RESPONDING TO BLESSINGS: THE SECOND PAIR PART OF BLESSING SPEECH ACTS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH

Blessings are usually studied as initiating acts. This article examines their second pair part: what a person says after being blessed. Drawing on conversation analysis (adjacency pairs and preference organisation), speech act theory and politeness theory, it compares responses to blessings in Uzbek and English. Uzbek examples are taken from the author's literary corpus (Abdulla Qodiriy, Gʻafur Gʻulom, Oʻtkir Hoshimov); English examples are conventional exchanges of everyday usage. Five response types are distinguished: ratification (Omin), echoing, reciprocation (Sizga ham; You too), thanking (Rahmat; Thank you) and counter-blessing (Baraka toping). The analysis shows that Uzbek treats a blessing as a petition to God that the recipient co-signs, so ratification, echoing and counter-blessing are preferred responses. English treats a blessing mainly as a gift to the hearer, so thanking and reciprocation are preferred. The comparison explains recurrent pragmatic difficulties in Uzbek–English communication and translation: a ratifying Omin rendered as Amen sounds liturgical in English, while a bare Thank you may under-perform the response an Uzbek blesser expects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HSR (London)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23696060
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RESPONDING TO BLESSINGS: THE SECOND PAIR PART OF BLESSING SPEECH ACTS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH

Qurbanbayeva Nilufar, Worldly Knowledge Publishing Centre
2 links
HSR (London)
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

RESPONDING TO BLESSINGS: THE SECOND PAIR PART OF BLESSING SPEECH ACTS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH

Qurbanbayeva Nilufar, Worldly Knowledge Publishing Centre
article en

Abstract

Blessings are usually studied as initiating acts. This article examines their second pair part: what a person says after being blessed. Drawing on conversation analysis (adjacency pairs and preference organisation), speech act theory and politeness theory, it compares responses to blessings in Uzbek and English. Uzbek examples are taken from the author's literary corpus (Abdulla Qodiriy, Gʻafur Gʻulom, Oʻtkir Hoshimov); English examples are conventional exchanges of everyday usage. Five response types are distinguished: ratification (Omin), echoing, reciprocation (Sizga ham; You too), thanking (Rahmat; Thank you) and counter-blessing (Baraka toping). The analysis shows that Uzbek treats a blessing as a petition to God that the recipient co-signs, so ratification, echoing and counter-blessing are preferred responses. English treats a blessing mainly as a gift to the hearer, so thanking and reciprocation are preferred. The comparison explains recurrent pragmatic difficulties in Uzbek–English communication and translation: a ratifying Omin rendered as Amen sounds liturgical in English, while a bare Thank you may under-perform the response an Uzbek blesser expects.

HSR (London)
Urgench State University (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon