GOWC: an open tool for observing-conditions prediction and observation planning, tested against site monitors and an exposure-time calculator

GOWC (Global Observing-conditions Weather Catalogue) is an open web application that takes the user from a target to an exposure plan across 2,642 catalogued observatory sites. It computes seeing, airmass, extinction, precipitable water vapour, sky brightness and signal-to-noise from live Open-Meteo meteorology, including pressure-level profiles, and tests most of these outputs against an independent reference. The photometric SNR calculator, run with GOWC's own catalogue entries, reproduces the ING SIGNAL exposure-time calculator to a median 1.9 per cent over a 16-point magnitude-airmass grid on two instruments. Precipitable water vapour tracks the Paranal LHATPRO radiometer closely ($ρ=+0.95$, 606 nights) with a +43 per cent wet bias. Seeing is computed from the Tatarski $C_n^2$ chain integrated over the pressure levels above the site and calibrated to the ESO MASS free-atmosphere median at Paranal; matching it requires an effective Tatarski coefficient of 5.7, nearly twice the upper end of the published range, which quantifies how much turbulence four coarse pressure levels fail to resolve. Against ~20 months of ESO DIMM data the seeing forecast has a weak but significant night-to-night ranking skill ($ρ=+0.24$, 575 nights, at Paranal; +0.16 at La Silla). Surface wind alone does as well or better (+0.27, +0.41) and persistence does better (+0.42, +0.47), but the free-atmosphere term tracks MASS ($ρ=+0.35$) and carries information that surface wind does not (partial $ρ=+0.28$, +0.40). At held-out sites the absolute seeing scale is no better than a constant. GOWC therefore treats forecast seeing as indicative, shows measured values wherever a public site monitor exists, and states which outputs are measured, calibrated or unvalidated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.34940
Primary Topic
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

GOWC: an open tool for observing-conditions prediction and observation planning, tested against site monitors and an exposure-time calculator

Ahzam Ahmed
arXiv (Cornell University)
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
preprint

GOWC: an open tool for observing-conditions prediction and observation planning, tested against site monitors and an exposure-time calculator

Ahzam Ahmed
preprint en

Abstract

GOWC (Global Observing-conditions Weather Catalogue) is an open web application that takes the user from a target to an exposure plan across 2,642 catalogued observatory sites. It computes seeing, airmass, extinction, precipitable water vapour, sky brightness and signal-to-noise from live Open-Meteo meteorology, including pressure-level profiles, and tests most of these outputs against an independent reference. The photometric SNR calculator, run with GOWC's own catalogue entries, reproduces the ING SIGNAL exposure-time calculator to a median 1.9 per cent over a 16-point magnitude-airmass grid on two instruments. Precipitable water vapour tracks the Paranal LHATPRO radiometer closely ($ρ=+0.95$, 606 nights) with a +43 per cent wet bias. Seeing is computed from the Tatarski $C_n^2$ chain integrated over the pressure levels above the site and calibrated to the ESO MASS free-atmosphere median at Paranal; matching it requires an effective Tatarski coefficient of 5.7, nearly twice the upper end of the published range, which quantifies how much turbulence four coarse pressure levels fail to resolve. Against ~20 months of ESO DIMM data the seeing forecast has a weak but significant night-to-night ranking skill ($ρ=+0.24$, 575 nights, at Paranal; +0.16 at La Silla). Surface wind alone does as well or better (+0.27, +0.41) and persistence does better (+0.42, +0.47), but the free-atmosphere term tracks MASS ($ρ=+0.35$) and carries information that surface wind does not (partial $ρ=+0.28$, +0.40). At held-out sites the absolute seeing scale is no better than a constant. GOWC therefore treats forecast seeing as indicative, shows measured values wherever a public site monitor exists, and states which outputs are measured, calibrated or unvalidated.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon