How Much Sensing is Enough? Landslide Detection from Sparse and Noisy 3D Observations

Dense 3D terrain information is critical for accurate landslide detection; however, acquiring such data at large scale is often limited by sensing infrastructure, coverage, and environmental conditions. Emerging sensing modalities (e.g., mmWave, low-cost radar, sparse LiDAR) can operate under adverse conditions, but inherently produce sparse and noisy 3D observations, raising an important question: \emph{how much sensing is sufficient for reliable landslide detection?} Given the absence of large-scale sparse-terrain datasets, we have constructed a physics-informed dataset by combining digital elevation models from OpenTopography with soil moisture data from NASA's SMAP. Subsequently, we have randomly generated landslide events and introduced controlled sparsification and stochastic noise to emulate sensing constraints. We have then developed a learning-based framework to reconstruct the underlying terrain and identify landslide-prone regions using a CNN + XGBoost method. Our results show that with only 20\% of the original observations, the proposed method achieves a detection accuracy of 80\% and a ROC-AUC of 0.868, with a reconstruction error (L2 Chamfer Distance) of 99.67~$m^2$ on the test set. We have further studied the impact of sparsity, highlighting the trade-off between sensing density and detection performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.34869
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

How Much Sensing is Enough? Landslide Detection from Sparse and Noisy 3D Observations

Basabdatta Palit, Dipanjyoti Paul, Arijit Pal, Abhijit Mohanty et al.
arXiv (Cornell University)
Landslides and related hazards
preprint

How Much Sensing is Enough? Landslide Detection from Sparse and Noisy 3D Observations

Basabdatta Palit, Dipanjyoti Paul, Arijit Pal, Abhijit Mohanty, Sandip Chakraborty
preprint en

Abstract

Dense 3D terrain information is critical for accurate landslide detection; however, acquiring such data at large scale is often limited by sensing infrastructure, coverage, and environmental conditions. Emerging sensing modalities (e.g., mmWave, low-cost radar, sparse LiDAR) can operate under adverse conditions, but inherently produce sparse and noisy 3D observations, raising an important question: \emph{how much sensing is sufficient for reliable landslide detection?} Given the absence of large-scale sparse-terrain datasets, we have constructed a physics-informed dataset by combining digital elevation models from OpenTopography with soil moisture data from NASA's SMAP. Subsequently, we have randomly generated landslide events and introduced controlled sparsification and stochastic noise to emulate sensing constraints. We have then developed a learning-based framework to reconstruct the underlying terrain and identify landslide-prone regions using a CNN + XGBoost method. Our results show that with only 20\% of the original observations, the proposed method achieves a detection accuracy of 80\% and a ROC-AUC of 0.868, with a reconstruction error (L2 Chamfer Distance) of 99.67~$m^2$ on the test set. We have further studied the impact of sparsity, highlighting the trade-off between sensing density and detection performance.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
How Much Sensing is Enough? Landslide Detection from Sparse and Noisy 3D Observations — Basabdatta Palit, Dipanjyoti Paul, et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS